Bill · H.R. 6915· House(119-HR-6915)
To prohibit the use of funds to use military force in or against Venezuela, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 12/19/2025
- Last activity
- 12/19/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Seth Moulton
- Cosponsors
- - 32 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill seeks to prohibit the use of federal funds for military force in or against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. The restriction begins on the date the Act is enacted and lasts until December 31, 2026. Military force would only be allowed if Congress declares war or passes specific statutory authorization that meets War Powers Resolution requirements. There is an exception for military force consistent with section 2(c) of the War powers Resolution.
Yes
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+2
By restricting unilateral military action, the bill prioritizes legislative and diplomatic processes over military force.
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+1
The bill restricts the use of funds for military force in or against Venezuela, thereby limiting potential military expenditures in that region.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-1
The bill limits the executive branch's ability to deploy military force by requiring explicit congressional authorization.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Prevention of unauthorized military action: By requiring a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, the bill prevents the Federal Government from obligating or expending funds for military force in or against Venezuela without explicit Congressional approval (Section 1(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text: The document does not contain information regarding potential negative consequences or burdens.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+2Reduces Military Spending+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power-1
- 3/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 1/7/2026
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 12/19/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 15 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Jason CrowDemocrat · Colorado
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Jared GoldenDemocrat · Maine
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
James HimesDemocrat · Connecticut
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Gregory MeeksDemocrat · New York
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Patrick RyanDemocrat · New York
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia