Bill · H.R. 6818· House(119-HR-6818)
Part-Time Worker Bill of Rights Act
- Introduced
- 12/17/2025
- Last activity
- 12/17/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Janice Schakowsky
- Cosponsors
- - 34 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Part-Time Worker Bill of Rights Act. It changes the rules for family and medical leave so that employees can qualify after working for at least 90 days instead of meeting prior service hour requirements. The legislation prohibits employers from discriminating against workers based on the number of hours they are scheduled to work. It also requires employers to offer available work hours to existing employees before hiring new workers or outside contractors. Furthermore, the bill establishes rules against retaliation and outlines penalties and enforcement mechanisms for violations.
Yes· 3 of 31
Would women be better off under this?+7
Women disproportionately hold part-time jobs and benefit significantly from expanded family leave and non-discrimination rules.
Would students be better off under this?+7
Students working part-time gain fair treatment in pay, benefits, and scheduling flexibility.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+6
Young adults frequently enter the workforce in part-time or temporary positions and benefit greatly from these protections.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
Employers face new administrative costs, record-keeping mandates, and scheduling restrictions.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?-3
The record-keeping and scheduling mandates place additional administrative and compliance burdens on small businesses.
Would farmers be better off under this?-1
Agricultural employers may experience increased administrative burdens from new labor rules.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 101: This section eliminates the old requirement that employees must work 1,250 hours over 12 months to qualify for family and medical leave. Instead, workers only need to be employed for at least 90 days. This makes family and medical leave much easier for part-time and newer workers to access.
-
Section 202: This provision stops employers from discriminating against workers just because they are scheduled to work fewer hours or for a shorter duration. It ensures equal treatment regarding pay, benefits, promotions, and work hours for jobs requiring similar skills.
-
Section 203: This section requires employers to ask new hires for their desired work hours and to offer those extra hours to current employees before bringing in outside help or temporary staff. This gives current part-time workers the first chance to pick up more hours and increase their earnings.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 203: Employers must track written statements of desired hours and offer extra work to current employees before hiring externally, which adds administrative burdens. If employers fail to follow these complex scheduling rules, they may face enforcement actions.
-
Section 205: This section establishes strict record-keeping requirements for employers, who must keep compliance records for at least three years. While this protects workers, it places a heavy paperwork burden on businesses, particularly small or medium-sized operations.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Students+7Good For Women+7Good For Low Income Households+6Good For Young Adults+6Good For Immigrants+4Good For Men+4Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Seniors+4Good For Union Workers+4Good For African Americans+3Good For Children+3Good For Hispanic Americans+3Good For Middle Aged+3Good For People With Disabilities+3Good For Retirees+3Good For Urban Residents+3Good For Veterans+3Good For Asian Americans+2Good For L G B T Q Community+2Good For Native Americans+2Good For Rural Residents+2Good For White Americans+2Good For Business Owners-3Good For Farmers-1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality+6Improves Poverty Reduction+4Improves Racial Equity+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Union Protections+5Increases Job Creation+4Improves Economic Growth+3Improves Small Business Support-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+3Increases Federal Power+3
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+6
- 6/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 31 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan