Bill · H.R. 6194· House(119-HR-6194)
Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 11/20/2025
- Last activity
- 3/26/2026 — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- Sponsored by
- Wesley Hunt
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 3
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2025 aims to limit civil actions that are affected by United States sanctions. It establishes a policy to ensure United States persons are not disadvantaged when complying with sanctions or export controls. The bill prohibits the enforcement of foreign judgments or arbitral awards if they arise from actions taken to comply with U.S. sanctions. It also prevents enforcement if a foreign court asserted jurisdiction based on the imposition of such sanctions. Additionally, the act allows defendants to remove such actions to a U.S. district court for dismissal.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
The bill provides a mechanism to dismiss lawsuits that arise from compliance with U.S. sanctions.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+3
The bill explicitly preserves the rights of victims who are members of the United States Armed Forces.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+3
The bill protects U.S. persons and businesses from being sued for complying with federal sanctions and export controls.
The opposite
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-3
The bill limits the ability of foreign parties to enforce legal judgments and arbitral awards in U.S. courts.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?-2
The bill restricts the ability of foreign entities to enforce judgments against U.S. persons, which may strain international legal relations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection for U.S. Persons complying with law: The policy ensures that United States persons are not disadvantaged for actions or omissions taken to comply with United States sanctions or export controls (Section 2).
-
Prevention of compensation for foreign persons: The bill ensures that foreign persons, or those acting for them, cannot obtain compensation for actions related to United States persons attempting to comply with their obligations under sanctions or export controls in good faith (Section 2).
-
Legal recourse through dismissal: If a person is facing a civil action to enforce a foreign judgment or award related to sanctions, they can have that action removed to a U.S. district court to be dismissed (Section 3(a) and 3(b)).
-
Protection of existing rights: The bill preserves the rights of victims of international terrorism, torture, extrajudicial killing, aircraft sabotage, or hostage taking if they are U.S. nationals, military members, or government employees (Section 3(c)(2)).
-
Preservation of domestic dispute resolution: The bill does not limit rights or remedies arising from contractual rights where parties agreed to resolve disputes through litigation or arbitration within the United States (Section 3(c)(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Limitation on foreign judgments and awards: The bill prevents individuals from bringing civil actions in Federal or State courts to enforce foreign judgments or arbitral awards if the underlying conduct resulted from compliance with U.S. sanctions (Section 3(a)(1)).
-
Jurisdictional limitations: People may be unable to enforce claims if a court or tribunal issued a judgment or award based, even in part, on the imposition of United States sanctions or export controls (Section 3(a)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5Good For Veterans+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Second Amendment Protections+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+2Improves International Alliances-2
- 3/26/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Scott FitzgeraldRepublican · Wisconsin
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Laurel LeeRepublican · Florida
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey