Bill · H.R. 5894· House(119-HR-5894)
RESTRAIN Act
- Introduced
- 10/31/2025
- Last activity
- 11/19/2025 — Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4779-4780)
- Sponsored by
- Dina Titus
- Cosponsors
- - 29 - 0
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Renewing Efforts to Suspend Testing and Reinforce Arms-control Initiatives Now Act or the RESTRAIN Act. It amends the Atomic Energy Defense Act to ban the United States from conducting any explosive testing of nuclear weapons or any other nuclear explosion. The bill also blocks the use of funds authorized for fiscal year 2026 or any other fiscal year from being used for these explosive tests or nuclear explosions. However, the bill clarifies that it does not limit the authority of the United States to conduct subcritical nuclear tests. Subcritical nuclear tests are defined as tests of fissile materials that cannot sustain an explosive nuclear chain reaction.
Yes
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+5
Prohibiting explosive nuclear testing reduces the risk of radioactive contamination and environmental damage.
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+3
The bill prevents the allocation of funds toward the conduct of explosive nuclear testing.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+2
The bill prohibits the use of authorized funds for explosive nuclear testing or any other nuclear explosion.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2 prohibits the United States from conducting any explosive testing of a nuclear weapon or any other nuclear explosion, which stops these specific types of powerful blasts.
-
Section 2 blocks funding for fiscal year 2026 and any other fiscal year from being used to conduct explosive nuclear weapon testing or other nuclear explosions, ensuring taxpayer dollars are not spent on these activities.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific negative impacts or burdens identified for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Reduces Military Spending+3
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+2
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/2/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/19/2025
- Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4779-4780)
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/18/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 12 Cosponsors added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/31/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Introduced in House
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Joseph MorelleDemocrat · New York
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Eric SwalwellDemocrat · California
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia