Bill · H.R. 5005· House(119-HR-5005)
Sanctuary Penalty and Public Protection Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 8/19/2025
- Last activity
- 8/19/2025 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Chip Roy
- Cosponsors
- - 29 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the ``Sanctuary Penalty and Public Protection Act of 2025'', seeks to amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. It directs the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General to create a public database of sanctuary jurisdictions. These jurisdictions are defined as State or local government entities with certain laws, regulations, or practices. The bill also prohibits the obligation or expenditure of Federal funds with respect to these identified jurisdictions.
Yes
Does this tighten control of the border?+4
The bill aims to increase cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities through the enforcement of detainers.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-6
The bill reduces state and local autonomy by penalizing them for their specific laws and practices regarding immigration.
Would immigrants be better off under this?-5
The bill targets jurisdictions that provide sanctuary and increases the likelihood of federal interaction with immigrants in local custody.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-5
The bill prohibits the expenditure of federal funds for jurisdictions identified as sanctuary jurisdictions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Creation of a Public Database: The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General will develop and maintain a publicly available database of jurisdictions with specific policies (Section 2(a)(1)). This provides transparency regarding which government entities are considered sanctuary jurisdictions.
-
Standardization of Law Enforcement Compliance: The bill targets jurisdictions that prohibit or restrict law enforcement from complying with certain detainers or authorized arrests (Section 2(a)(2)). This aims to ensure law enforcement agencies can comply with federal detainers and specified arrest authorities.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Federal Funding for Local Governments: The bill prohibits the obligation or expenditure of Federal funds for any entity identified as a sanctuary jurisdiction (Section 2(c)). This could result in a loss of money for State or local government entities that have specific laws, regulations, or practices regarding immigration or law enforcement cooperation.
-
Restrictions on Interviews: The bill identifies jurisdictions that prohibit the Secretary or Attorney General from interviewing incarcerated individuals to determine their legal status or involvement in a crime as sanctuary jurisdictions (Section 2(a)(3)). This could impact how certain government entities handle interviews of incarcerated individuals.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants-5Good For Low Income Households-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights-6
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+4Improves Pathway To Citizenship-3
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/22/2025
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- 8/19/2025
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Eric BurlisonRepublican · Missouri
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
H. GriffithRepublican · Virginia
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
Scott PerryRepublican · Pennsylvania
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Thomas TiffanyRepublican · Wisconsin
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas