Bill · H.R. 4987· House(119-HR-4987)
Food Date Labeling Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 8/15/2025
- Last activity
- 1/13/2026 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
- Sponsored by
- Chellie Pingree
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 4
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Food Date Labeling Act of 2025 establishes requirements for food labels that voluntarily include quality or discard date phrases. It mandates uniform phrases like "BEST If Used By" for quality and "USE By" for discard dates. Dates must be presented in a specific month and year or month, day, and year format using easy-to-read type. The Act allows for the use of various technologies like QR codes for these labels. It also requires consumer education and outreach regarding these date phrases. The new rules will apply to food products labeled after a two-year period following the Act's enactment.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+4
The Act improves consumer protection by standardizing food date labels and requiring they be easy to read and prominent.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+2
Standardized and easy-to-read date formats can assist seniors in tracking food quality and safety.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+2
Clearer labeling may assist low-income households in maximizing the use of their food purchases.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Uniformity and Clarity: The Act requires specific, uniform phrases for quality and discard dates, such as "BEST If Used By" or "USE By" (Section 3(a)(2) and 3(b)(2)). This standardization, combined with a requirement for easy-to-read type and conspicuous placement, helps consumers understand when quality may change or when a product should no longer be consumed (Section 2(2), 2(3), and 3(c)(1)).
-
Consistent Date Formats: By requiring dates to be stated in terms of month and year or month, day, and year, the bill ensures consumers receive specific timeframes (Section 3(c)(2)).
-
Consumer Education: The administering Secretaries are required to provide consumer education and outreach within two years of the Act's enactment to explain the meaning of these date phrases (Section s 3(d)).
-
Technological Flexibility: The law allows for the use of modern technologies, such as QR codes or smart labels, to assist with date labeling (Section 3(c)(4)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on State Labeling: The Act prevents states or political subdivisions from establishing food labeling requirements for quality or discard dates that are different from or not identical to those in this Act (Section 3(e)(3)(A)).
-
Limited State Authority on Quality: States are prohibited from creating requirements that prohibit the sale or donation of foods based on the passage of a quality date (Section 3(e)(3)(B)).
-
Exclusion of Infant Formula: The provisions of this Act do not apply to infant formula (Section 3(e)(2)(A)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Seniors+2Good For Urban Residents+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+4
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+1
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/13/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/8/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/15/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Robert BresnahanRepublican · Pennsylvania
Sean CastenDemocrat · Illinois
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey