Bill · S. 2541· Senate(119-S-2541)
Food Date Labeling Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 7/30/2025
- Last activity
- 7/30/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- Sponsored by
- Richard Blumenthal
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, called the "Food Date Labeling Act of 2025," aims to standardize the language used in quality and discard date phrases on food labels. It mandates the use of "BEST If Used By" for quality dates and "USE By" for discard dates, while allowing for the use of "BB" and "UB" abbreviations on smaller packages. The bill emphasizes consumer education and leaves the decision to include these dates to the food labeler.
Yes· 3 of 9
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+2
Clear and standard date labeling on food products can significantly reduce food waste and confusion, benefiting seniors.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+2
Reducing food waste through clearer labeling can stretch food budgets for low-income households.
Would retired people be better off under this?+2
Clearer food labeling helps retirees, who may be on fixed incomes, reduce unnecessary waste.
The opposite
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-1
The bill preempts states from establishing different food labeling requirements, reducing their regulatory autonomy.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Standardized Date Labels (Section 3(a)(2) and 3(b)(2)): Using "BEST If Used By" and "USE By" could help people better understand the difference between food quality and safety, potentially reducing food waste and confusion.
- Consumer Education (Section 3(d)): The administering Secretaries are required to educate people on the meaning of the date phrases on food packaging within two years of the Act's enactment, this would likely improve consumer awareness and decision-making.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- State Preemption (Section 3(e)(3)): States can't create their own date labeling requirements that are different from this federal law, potentially removing standards some states may already have in place for consumer safety.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Retirees+2Good For Seniors+2Good For Children+1Good For Middle Aged+1Good For Middle Class Households+1Good For Young Adults+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+1Increase States Rights-1
- 3/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/9/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/30/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon