Bill · H.R. 4528· House(119-HR-4528)
Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 7/17/2025
- Last activity
- 7/17/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Janice Schakowsky
- Cosponsors
- - 22 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill makes it illegal to sell goods or services at a grossly excessive price, regardless of where a person is in the supply chain. It gives the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general the power to enforce this rule, stop violations, and seek penalties. The bill also sets rules for companies to report pricing and cost information in their filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission during exceptional market shocks. Additionally, it provides one billion dollars in funding to the Federal Trade Commission to carry out this work.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+8
The act provides significant protections against gross price gouging through FTC enforcement and consumer restitution.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+7
Protecting against price gouging during emergencies directly benefits those with limited financial buffers.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6
The act mandates detailed pricing and cost disclosures in SEC filings for large companies.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would billionaires be better off under this?-5
The bill targets entities with very high revenues, potentially affecting massive corporations.
Would business owners be better off under this?-4
Large companies face significant new compliance, disclosure, and penalty risks.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-3
The bill establishes a high 'clear and convincing evidence' standard for rebutting presumptions of violation.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection from Price Gouging: Section 3(a) makes it unlawful to sell goods or services at a grossly excessive price. This provision helps protect everyday people from being overcharged by businesses.
-
Shield During Emergencies: Section 3(c) establishes presumptive violations for excessive pricing during exceptional market shocks. This helps safeguard consumers from unfair price hikes when they are most vulnerable during crises or emergencies.
-
More Transparency from Companies: Section 4(b) requires certain issuers to disclose detailed pricing strategies, cost changes, and gross margins in their SEC filings following quarters with exceptional market shocks. This provision holds elected and corporate officials accountable by making business practices transparent to the public.
-
State Level Enforcement: Section 3(g) allows state attorneys general to bring civil actions and obtain restitution on behalf of state residents. This provision gives local officials the ability to fight directly for consumers in their home states.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Increased Compliance Burdens: Section 4(b) requires companies to provide extensive tabular data and detailed narrative disclosures regarding their pricing strategies and costs in SEC filings. These heavy reporting requirements could potentially increase operational costs for businesses, which might be passed down to everyday consumers.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+6Increases Federal Power+5Increase States Rights+3Improves Due Process-3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+8Improves Small Business Support-2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+7Good For Middle Class Households+5Good For Billionaires-5Good For Business Owners-4
- 9/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/1/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/17/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 12 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan