Bill · H.R. 4194· House(119-HR-4194)
Limiting Liability for Critical Infrastructure Manufacturers Act
- Introduced
- 6/26/2025
- Last activity
- 6/26/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Mariannette Miller-Meeks
- Cosponsors
- - 21 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Limiting Liability for Critical Infrastructure Manufacturers Act," aims to protect certain companies from legal consequences. It proposes to make manufacturers of critical infrastructure immune from liability and suits under both Federal and State law regarding claims from wildfire incidents. This immunity applies to losses caused by, arising out of, or resulting from such wildfires. The only exception to this protection is if there is proof of willful misconduct during the design or production of the equipment.
Yes
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
Manufacturers of critical infrastructure benefit significantly from reduced legal liability risks.
The opposite· 3 of 9
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?-5
The bill limits consumer recourse by granting manufacturers immunity from wildfire-related liability claims.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-4
The bill may weaken environmental accountability by shielding manufacturers from liability related to wildfire damage.
Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster?-3
The bill could hinder recovery efforts by making it harder for victims of wildfires to seek compensation from manufacturers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Legal Immunity for Manufacturers: Manufacturers of critical infrastructure equipment would be immune from suit and liability for claims resulting from wildfire incidents, unless willful misconduct in design or production is proven. (Section 3(a))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Reduced Ability to Seek Damages: The bill would limit the ability to sue manufacturers for losses caused by or relating to wildfire incidents, as they would be immune from suit and liability under Federal and State law unless willful misconduct is proven. (Section 3(a))
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-4Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A-3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5Good For Low Income Households-3Good For Rural Residents-3Good For Farmers-2Good For Middle Class Households-2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process-3Increase States Rights-2
- 2/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/11/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/4/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/8/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/26/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Troy BaldersonRepublican · Ohio
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Scott FitzgeraldRepublican · Wisconsin
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Robert LattaRepublican · Ohio
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California
Robert OnderRepublican · Missouri
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Jimmy PatronisRepublican · Florida
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Dale StrongRepublican · Alabama
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Thomas TiffanyRepublican · Wisconsin
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas