Bill · H.R. 4062· House(119-HR-4062)
MONARCH Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 6/20/2025
- Last activity
- 6/20/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Jimmy Panetta
- Cosponsors
- - 16 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The MONARCH Act of 2025 aims to protect and sustain the western population of monarch butterflies. This bill establishes the Western Monarch Butterfly Rescue Fund to provide grants for conservation projects involving habitats like milkweed and nectar plants. The Secretary of the Interior will oversee these grants, which are available to entities like local governments, Tribal governments, research institutions, and nonprofits. Additionally, the Secretary will work with the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to update and implement a specific conservation plan. The legislation includes authorized appropriations for these funds from fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Yes· 3 of 9
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+8
The bill provides significant funding and planning to protect the western monarch butterfly and its essential habitats.
Does this put more money into scientific research?+5
The bill allocates significant funds for conservation projects that likely include research-based methods.
Would Native Americans be better off under this?+4
The bill explicitly includes Tribal governments as eligible entities for conservation grants.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Pollination Services: Enhancing pollinator populations can lead to better pollination services for neighboring land, which includes agriculture and wildlife ecosystems (Section 2, Paragraph 7).
-
Support for Local and Tribal Entities: The bill allows for grant opportunities for relevant local governments, Tribal governments, research institutions, and nonprofit organizations to engage in conservation work (Section 4, Subsection b, Paragraph 1).
-
Technical Assistance: The Secretary is tasked with providing technical assistance to entities that receive project grants (Section 4, Subsection e).
-
Public Transparency: The Secretary is required to make project reports and documents available to the public in a timely manner (Section 4, Subsection f, Paragraph 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on State and Federal Agencies: While state or federal agencies can be partners, they are prohibited from acting as the lead entity or receiving grants directly under the conservation grant program (Section 4, Subsection b, Paragraph 2).
-
Compliance Requirements for Proposals: To receive funding, entities must provide detailed information regarding their qualifications, implementation methods, and outcome assessments, and must ensure their work does not conflict with food safety measures (Section 4, Subsection b, Paragraph 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+8Improves Public Land Management+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Native Americans+4Good For Farmers+2Good For Rural Residents+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4Increases Federal Power+2
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+1
- 3/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/20/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
James HimesDemocrat · Connecticut
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii