Bill · H.R. 3492· House(119-HR-3492)
Protect Children’s Innocence Act
- Introduced
- 5/19/2025
- Last activity
- 12/18/2025 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Marjorie Greene
- Cosponsors
- - 44 - 0
- Introduced
- Passed House
- In Senate committee
What this bill would do
The "Protect Children's Innocence Act" proposes amendments to title 18 of the United States Code regarding the treatment of minors. The bill aims to criminalize genital or bodily mutilation and chemical castration performed on individuals under the age of eighteen. It defines these acts broadly to include various surgeries intended to change a person's body to correspond to a sex different from their biological sex. The Act establishes specific penalties, including fines and potential imprisonment for up to 10 years. It also includes specific exceptions for medical necessity and certain physiological conditions.
Yes
Does this give the federal government more power?+5
The bill expands federal criminal jurisdiction over medical procedures involving minors.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?-8
The bill directly targets and criminalizes gender-affirming surgeries and hormone treatments used by the LGBTQ community.
Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?-7
The bill restricts access to gender-affirming medical treatments which negatively impacts the rights and autonomy of LGBTQ+ individuals.
Would children be better off under this?-5
The bill limits medical options for minors regarding gender-related healthcare.
What Congress actually voted on
2 recorded votes have been taken on this bill. One of them decided something; the rest moved it along.
- The House: the vote on whether to pass the billPassed 216–211
This is the real decision in this chamber. Passing here sends the bill to the other chamber, which must pass it too before it can go to the President.
12/17/2025 · Roll call 351 · recorded as “On Passage”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Criminal penalties for specific procedures: The bill establishes fines and potential imprisonment of up to 10 years for those who knowingly perform, attempt to perform, or facilitate genital or bodily mutilation or chemical castration on a minor (Section 2(a) and 2(b)).
-
Protection for victims from prosecution: The Act stipulates that individuals who have undergone these procedures cannot be arrested or prosecuted for an offense under this section (Section 2(f)).
-
Medical exceptions for health and safety: The bill provides exceptions where the procedures are considered necessary for the health of a minor and are performed by a licensed medical practitioner (Section 2(g)(1)(A)).
-
Exemptions for specific medical conditions: The law allows for these procedures in cases involving individuals with specific biological conditions, such as those with both ovarian and testicular tissue or those experiencing infection or injury caused by previous procedures (Section 2(g)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on gender-affirming procedures: The bill defines "genital or bodily mutilation" to include various surgeries intended to change a body to correspond to a different sex, such as mastectomies, hysterectomies, or various reconstructive surgeries (Section 2(h)(1)(B)).
-
Restrictions on chemical treatments: The bill classifies the administration of certain medications, such as puberty-blocking drugs or supraphysiologic doses of hormones, as "chemical castration" when used for the purposes described in the act (Section 2(h)(2)).
-
Limited scope of medical necessity: The bill specifies that for the purpose of a medical exception, the "health of a minor" does not include mental, behavioral, or emotional distress or disorders (Section 2(g)(1)(B)).
-
Removal of religious and traditional defenses: The Act states that it is not a defense to claim that female genital mutilation is required due to religion, custom, tradition, ritual, or standard practice (Section 2(e)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For L G B T Q Community-8Good For Children-5Good For Young Adults-5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves L G B T Q Rights-7
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+5
| Updated | Bill | Title | Policy Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 months ago | On agreeing to the Rules amendment (A001) Agreed to without objection. |
- 12/18/2025
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 12/17/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 211 (Roll no. 351).
- On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 211 (Roll no. 351). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H5992-5993)
- On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 218 (Roll no. 350).
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6008-6009)
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 3492, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Balint demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
- Ms. Balint moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H5999-6000)
- The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3492.
- Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6703, H.R. 498 and H.R. 3492. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 6703 and H.R. 498 under a closed rule and H.R. 3492 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
- Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 953. (consideration: CR H5992-6000)
- Rule H. Res. 953 passed House.
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 953 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6703, H.R. 498 and H.R. 3492. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 6703 and H.R. 498 under a closed rule and H.R. 3492 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
- 9/26/2025
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-311.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 265.
- 9/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/29/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 17 - 10.
- 5/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 38 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Stephanie BiceRepublican · Oklahoma
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Eric BurlisonRepublican · Missouri
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
James ComerRepublican · Kentucky
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Brad FinstadRepublican · Minnesota
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Lance GoodenRepublican · Texas
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Kevin HernRepublican · Oklahoma
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Riley MooreRepublican · West Virginia
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas