Bill · H.R. 3447· House(119-HR-3447)
Chip Security Act
- Introduced
- 5/15/2025
- Last activity
- 3/26/2026 — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.
- Sponsored by
- Bill Huizenga
- Cosponsors
- - 25 - 18
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The Chip Security Act requires the Secretary of Commerce to establish security standards for specific integrated circuit products. Under the bill, covered products must include security mechanisms that implement location verification before being exported, reexported, or transferred in-country. Licensees must also promptly report if a product is in an unauthorized location, diverted to a different user, or tampered with. The Secretary is further tasked with conducting assessments to develop secondary security requirements. These assessments must examine the feasibility, costs, and potential impacts of various security methods. Ultimately, the Act aims to protect national security by preventing the theft or unauthorized use of advanced computing hardware.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+6
Implements hardware and software security mechanisms to prevent unauthorized exploitation of chips.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+5
Strengthens relationships by providing allies with advanced computing capabilities through secure mechanisms.
Does this give the federal government more power?+5
Grants the Secretary of Commerce authority to set security standards and verify product ownership/location.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
Increases compliance costs and reporting burdens for chip exporters.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?-2
Increases government tracking of product location and ownership in foreign countries.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Enhanced National Security: Implementing chip security mechanisms is intended to protect the national security of the United States by securing advanced integrated circuits and computing hardware (Section 2, Subsection 3).
-
Support for International Partners: Providing advanced computing capabilities can help foster goodwill and strengthen relationships with allies and partners of the United States (Section 2, Subsection 2).
-
Increased Export Flexibility: The use of chip security mechanisms may allow for increased flexibility in export controls, which could lead to more international partners receiving larger and more streamlined shipments of advanced computing hardware (Section 2, Subsection 5).
-
Improved Compliance and Detection: These mechanisms are intended to improve compliance with United States export control laws and help detect the smuggling or exploitation of advanced products (Section 2, Subsections 4 and 5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Potential Performance Impacts: The implementation of new security methods may have a potential impact on the performance of covered integrated circuit products (Section 4, Subsection (b)(1)(B)(i)(I)).
-
Risk of New Vulnerabilities: There is a possibility that implementing these security methods could introduce new vulnerabilities into the products (Section 4, Subsection (b)(1)(B)(i)(II)).
-
Implementation Costs: The Secretary is required to analyze the potential costs associated with implementing various security methods, suggesting that these requirements may carry financial burdens (Section 4, Subsection (b)(1)(B)(i)(II)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Cybersecurity Defense+6Improves International Alliances+5Improves Diplomatic Engagement+4Improves International Trade+3
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+4
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+5Improves Privacy Rights-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+2
- 10/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.
- 3/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/30/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/8/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/22/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 8/12/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/6/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
John CarterRepublican · Texas
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Eric CrawfordRepublican · Arkansas
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Clay FullerRepublican · Georgia
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Robert LattaRepublican · Ohio
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California
Patrick RyanDemocrat · New York
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Elise StefanikRepublican · New York
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California