Bill · H.R. 2906· House(119-HR-2906)
SERVICE Act
- Introduced
- 4/10/2025
- Last activity
- 4/10/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Sponsored by
- Nikema Williams
- Cosponsors
- - 21 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The SERVICE Act aims to limit workforce reductions at Federal agencies. Under this bill, agencies are prohibited from reducing their total employee count by more than 5 percent of their initial fiscal year headcount until a specific report is submitted. This required report must include a thorough analysis of financial impacts and mission-related impacts. The analysis must cover costs such as pay, benefits, and administrative or contracting costs. Additionally, the report must detail how the reduction affects agency job functions, services, and customer experience. Finally, the Comptroller General is tasked with reviewing these reports and submitting a findings report to Congress.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+7
The bill improves transparency by requiring public reporting on the impacts of workforce reductions.
Does this give the federal government more power?+5
The bill increases federal oversight of agency workforce actions via the GAO and Comptroller General.
Would union members be better off under this?+3
The bill provides more stability and transparency for federal employees, which indirectly supports job security.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-3
By limiting rapid workforce reductions, the bill may hinder efforts to decrease government spending quickly.
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?-2
The bill may delay cost-saving workforce reductions that could reduce the national debt.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Accountability for Workforce Reductions: By requiring a thorough analysis of the expected effects of reducing staff, the bill ensures agencies must account for their actions before they can significantly reduce their workforce (Sec. 2(a)).
-
Financial Transparency: The bill requires agencies to provide an estimate of the net increase or decrease in costs, including pay, benefits, and potential contracting costs, which provides clarity on the financial implications of staffing changes (Sec. 2(a)(1)).
-
Protection of Government Services: The requirement for agencies to analyze how staff reductions affect the performance of job functions, timeliness, and customer experience serves to monitor the potential decline in service availability (Sec. 2(a)(2)(C)).
-
Independent Oversight: The Comptroller General is tasked with reviewing agency reports to ensure they contain required elements and are supported by complete and credible information, with findings published on a public website (Sec. 2(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Agency Workforce Adjustments: The bill prohibits an agency from removing or reducing its total number of employees by more than 5 percent until a report is submitted and processed, which limits an agency's ability to change its workforce size quickly (Sec. 2(a)).
-
Delayed Workforce Reductions: The process of submitting a report and waiting for the Comptroller General's review—which can take up to 180 days after the report is received—creates a timeline that must be followed before significant staff reductions can occur (Sec. 2(a) and Sec. 2(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+7Increases Federal Power+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility+3Reduces Government Spending-3Reduces National Debt-2
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/10/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Norma TorresDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida