Bill · H.R. 2905· House(119-HR-2905)
Ensuring Agency Service Quality Act
- Introduced
- 4/10/2025
- Last activity
- 4/10/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Sponsored by
- Nikema Williams
- Cosponsors
- - 16 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Ensuring Agency Service Quality Act aims to change how employment levels are handled in government agencies. It requires Executive agencies and military departments to maintain employment levels that match the amounts appropriated for them. This change amends Title 5 of the United States Code to move from a discretionary "may" to a mandatory "shall." If an agency or military department cannot meet these required employment levels, the head of that agency must take specific action. They are required to submit a noncompliance notice to relevant congressional committees. This notice must include an explanation of why they cannot comply with the new requirement.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3
The bill requires agencies to report noncompliance and the reasons for it to Congress, increasing transparency.
Is this likely to create jobs?+3
The bill mandates that agencies employ the full number of people for which they have been appropriated funds.
Does this give the federal government more power?+2
The bill mandates requirements upon Executive agencies, thereby centralizing control through mandatory employment levels.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Mandatory Employment Requirements: By changing the language from "may" to "shall," the bill requires Executive agencies and military departments to employ the number of people that were appropriated funds for. This could ensure that agencies have the workforce they are funded to maintain (Section 2(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Noncompliance Reporting Burden: If an agency or military department cannot meet the required employment levels, the head must submit a formal notice to several congressional committees. This includes providing an explanation of the reasons for the inability to comply (Section 2(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+3Increases Federal Power+2
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+3
- 6/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/10/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida