Bill · H.R. 2604· House(119-HR-2604)
Protecting Data at the Border Act
- Introduced
- 4/2/2025
- Last activity
- 4/2/2025 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Ted Lieu
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Protecting Data at the Border Act aims to safeguard the digital contents of electronic equipment and online accounts belonging to United States persons at the border. It establishes that government entities generally cannot access this digital data without a valid warrant supported by probable cause. The bill prohibits denying entry or exit based on a person's refusal to provide access credentials or digital information. While it allows for emergency exceptions and access for public safety, it mandates strict procedures for written consent. Furthermore, the Act includes requirements for recordkeeping and annual public reporting by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+10
This is the primary intent of the bill, providing robust privacy protections for digital contents and accounts.
Does this give people more control over their personal data?+9
The bill significantly strengthens data privacy protections for U.S. persons by requiring warrants for digital content access at the border.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+7
The bill enhances due process by requiring warrants and providing rules for the destruction of unlawfully obtained data.
The opposite
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-5
The bill explicitly restricts the ability of government agencies to conduct digital surveillance at the border without a warrant.
Does this give the federal government more power?-3
The bill limits the discretionary power of federal government agencies at the border.
Does this tighten control of the border?-2
The bill adds procedural constraints on border enforcement actions, which may slightly hinder the speed of digital intelligence gathering.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Enhanced Privacy Protections: The bill recognizes that United States persons have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their digital contents and online presence, which differs from privacy interests in closed containers (Section 2).
-
Warrant Requirements: It establishes a standard that government entities may not access digital contents of electronic equipment belonging to a United States person at the border without a valid warrant supported by probable cause (Section 4(a)(1)).
-
Protection Against Denial of Entry/Exit: The Act prevents the government from denying a United States person entry into or exit from the country based on their refusal to disclose access credentials or provide digital access (Section 4(a)(2)).
-
Limits on Detention Time: It prevents the government from delaying a person's entry or exit for longer than four hours while determining if they will consensually provide access (Section 4(a)(3)).
-
Rules for Emergency Access: In specific emergencies involving immediate danger of death, serious injury, or threats to national security, officers may access data, but they must apply for a warrant as soon as possible (Section 4(b)(1)).
-
Destruction of Unlawful Data: If digital contents are accessed without a warrant under emergency authority and a warrant is not obtained, the government must destroy the data and notify the individual (Section 4(b)(1)(B)).
-
Protection Against Unlawful Evidence: Any digital contents or information obtained in violation of this Act cannot be used as evidence in any trial, hearing, or proceeding (Section 5).
-
Limits on Seizure: A government entity is prohibited from seizing electronic equipment at the border unless there is probable cause to believe the equipment contains information relevant to a felony (Section 6).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Emergency Access Exceptions: Designated law enforcement officers may access digital contents without a warrant in emergency situations involving immediate danger of death, serious physical injury, or threats to national security or organized crime (Section 4(b)(1)(A)).
-
Public Safety Access: Government entities may access digital contents without a warrant if the access is necessary for fire, medical, public safety, or other emergency services, provided it is unrelated to a crime investigation (Section 4(b)(2)).
-
Potential for Seizure: If a United States person refuses to consensually provide access, and the government has probable cause regarding a felony, they may seize the electronic equipment (Section 4(c)(1)(B)(ii)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+10Improves Due Process+7Improves Government Transparency+6Increases Federal Power-3
- Education And Technology
- Improves Data Privacy+9
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Domestic Surveillance-5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Policing Reform+5Improves Border Security-2
- 5/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/2/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia