Bill · H.R. 2420· House(119-HR-2420)
Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 3/27/2025
- Last activity
- 3/27/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Sponsored by
- Madeleine Dean
- Cosponsors
- - 13 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act of 2025 aims to preserve natural landscapes across several Western states by designating various National Forest System lands, National Park System lands, and other public lands as wilderness areas. It establishes a system of biological connecting corridors to support wildlife movement and identifies certain watercourses for the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The legislation also identifies wildland recovery areas intended to restore biodiversity, native species, and natural, roadless conditions. These protections are overseen by an interagency team and a panel of independent scientists.
Yes· 3 of 13
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+10
The bill designates vast areas as wilderness to protect biodiversity, water quality, and native species.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+8
The bill aims to improve the management of public lands through integrated ecosystem protection.
Would Native Americans be better off under this?+7
The bill ensures nonexclusive access for Indians to protected areas for traditional cultural and religious purposes and protects sacred sites.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?-4
The bill prohibits mining, oil, and gas exploration/development in designated corridor management areas.
Does this repair or build roads and bridges?-3
The bill prohibits new road construction and aims to reduce road density in biological corridors.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?-3
The bill may negatively impact those currently reliant on resource extraction industries like timber and mining.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Economic Opportunities: The bill provides employment opportunities in outdoor trades through the establishment of rehabilitation zones for damaged Federal land (Section 2, Finding 21A) and provides contracts for local businesses (Section 2, Finding 21B).
-
Natural Resource Protection: Protecting roadless areas is intended to produce clean water and protect native fisheries, flora, and fauna (Section 2, Finding 4).
-
Water Security and Economy: Protecting the headwaters of major river systems is intended to enhance economic importance for farming, ranching, municipal water supplies, and water-based recreation (Section 2, Finding 5). Additionally, the bill reserves water rights sufficient to fulfill the purposes for which the land is designated as wilderness (Section 110(a)).
-
Recreational and Quality of Life Benefits: The designation of wilderness and protected areas aims to preserve scenic and recreational qualities (Section 2, Finding 4), which can help local communities attract new residents and businesses based on local quality of life (Section 2, Finding 13).
-
Scientific and Educational Value: The preservation of these ecosystems serves as a means to support educational and research centers for studies in biology, geology, astronomy, and other sciences (Section 2, Finding 12).
-
Protection of Natural Ecosystems: The designation of wilderness areas and biological connecting corridors aims to protect unique island mountain ranges and facilitate wildlife and plant migration (Section 201).
-
Ecological Restoration: The designation of recovery areas requires management intended to restore native vegetative cover, reduce invasive species, and stabilize soils (Section s 403(a)).
-
Tribal Cultural Protections: The bill ensures nonexclusive access for Indians to protected areas for traditional cultural and religious purposes (Section 605(b)(1)).
-
Protection of Sacred Sites: Federal agencies are exempted from disclosing information relating to sacred sites or cultural activities identified by an Indian Tribe (Section 603).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Economic Instability Concerns: The bill's findings suggest that current resource extraction has resulted in economic instability and high unemployment in rural, resource-dependent communities (Section 2, Finding 8), implying that shifts away from these activities could impact those currently reliant on them.
-
Loss of Resource Extraction: The text notes that an overemphasis on resource extraction has compromised ecosystem integrity (Section 2, Finding 8), and the act works to avoid misinvestment in land with marginal timber value (Section 3, Purpose 3b-8), which may impact industries like timber harvesting, mining, or oil and gas exploration (Section 4, Definition 2B).
-
Restrictions on Resource Extraction: The designation of special corridor management areas prohibits mining, oil, and gas exploration and development, subject to valid existing rights (Section 203(b)(2)).
-
Restrictions on Timber Industry: The bill prohibits even-aged silvicultural management and timber harvesting within the designated biological connecting corridors (Section 203(b)(1)).
-
Impact on Grazing Operations: The bill allows for the donation of valid existing grazing permits or leases within designated wilderness or corridors, which results in a permanent end to grazing on that land (Section 111(b)).
-
Road and Development Limitations: Within the biological connecting corridors, new road construction or reconstruction is prohibited (Section 203(b)(2)), and agencies are directed to reduce road density toward zero (Section 203(b)(3)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+10Improves Public Land Management+8Reduces Carbon Emissions+5Improves Rural Development+2Reduces Fossil Fuel Production-4Improves Roads And Bridges-3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+3Increases Job Creation+3Improves Economic Growth+2Improves Fiscal Responsibility+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Native Americans+7Good For Farmers+2Good For Students+1Good For Rural Residents-3Good For Business Owners-1
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+4
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+3
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/27/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Grace MengDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York