Bill · H.R. 236· House(119-HR-236)
Federal Employee Return to Work Act
- Introduced
- 1/7/2025
- Last activity
- 1/7/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Sponsored by
- Dan Newhouse
- Cosponsors
- - 21 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The ``Federal Employee Return to Work Act'' aims to prohibit specific telework employees from receiving certain annual pay adjustments. A "covered employee" is defined as someone who teleworks at least one day a week, or 20 percent of the time under an alternative work schedule. This definition excludes disabled employees receiving reasonable accommodations, members of the Foreign Service, Federal law enforcement officers, and members of the Armed Forces on active duty. Under this bill, covered employees are prohibited from receiving annual adjustments under section 5303 of title 5, United States Code. Instead, these employees must be paid at the rate of basic pay designated for the "Rest of U.S." locality pay area. The Act takes effect on the first day of the first full fiscal year after it is enacted.
Yes
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+3
The bill reduces federal payroll costs by prohibiting annual pay adjustments and capping pay at the 'Rest of U.S.' locality rate for teleworking employees.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+1
The bill protects disabled employees from the pay reductions by exempting those receiving reasonable accommodations from the 'covered employee' definition.
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?+1
The bill explicitly excludes disabled employees receiving reasonable accommodations from the pay reductions applied to other teleworkers.
The opposite
Would middle-income households be better off under this?-3
Federal employees who telework will likely experience a reduction in income due to the loss of annual pay adjustments and lower locality pay rates.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The provided text does not list any specific provisions that describe a positive outcome or benefit for individuals or groups.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Annual Pay Adjustments: Covered employees are prohibited from receiving annual adjustments under section 5303 of title 5, United States Code (Section 3).
-
Restricted Locality Pay: Covered employees shall be paid at the rate of basic pay for the locality pay area designated as ``Rest of U.S.,'' and this rate shall not be adjusted under section 5304 of title 5, United States Code (Section 4).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For People With Disabilities+1Good For Middle Class Households-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Disability Rights+1
- 2/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/15/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/9/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 1/7/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 12 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Jake EllzeyRepublican · Texas
Pat FallonRepublican · Texas
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Brad FinstadRepublican · Minnesota
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Richard HudsonRepublican · North Carolina
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Mike KellyRepublican · Pennsylvania
Doug LaMalfaRepublican · California
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Harold RogersRepublican · Kentucky
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas