Bill · H.R. 2111· House(119-HR-2111)
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to exempt the premium cigar industry from certain regulations.
- Introduced
- 3/14/2025
- Last activity
- 3/14/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Byron Donalds
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 10
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes an amendment to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The goal is to exempt the premium cigar industry from certain tobacco regulations. It defines a "premium cigar" through several specific manufacturing and composition requirements. By doing so, these specific products would no longer be classified as a "tobacco product" under certain sections of the Act.
Yes
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
The bill directly benefits owners in the premium cigar industry by reducing their regulatory burden.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+5
The bill provides regulatory relief specifically for the premium cigar industry, which the findings state is largely comprised of family-owned small businesses.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+5
By exempting these products from federal regulation, the bill effectively leaves their regulation to the states.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The bill seeks to reduce the scope of federal regulatory power over the premium cigar industry.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?-3
The bill exempts a specific tobacco-related product from federal oversight under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which may reduce direct federal consumer protections.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Exemption from specific regulations: The bill would remove premium cigars from the definition of a "tobocco product" under Section 201(rr) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Section 2). This would exempt the premium cigar industry from certain regulations.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts identified: The provided text does not explicitly list any negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+5Improves Consumer Protection-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+5Increases Federal Power-5
- 2/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/14/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Mario Diaz-BalartRepublican · Florida
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Scott FranklinRepublican · Florida
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Darrell IssaRepublican · California
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico