Bill · H.R. 1920· House(119-HR-1920)
FARMLAND Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 3/6/2025
- Last activity
- 3/28/2025 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
- Sponsored by
- Randy Feenstra
- Cosponsors
- - 13 - 6
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, the FARMLAND Act of 2025, aims to strengthen oversight of foreign investment in the U.S. agricultural industry. It amends the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 to enhance monitoring, increase penalties for non-compliance, and prevent malign actions by foreign entities. The bill also seeks to protect agricultural intellectual property and national security.
Yes· 3 of 7
Would farmers be better off under this?+4
By protecting U.S. agriculture from foreign espionage, the bill is good for farmers.
Does this invest in rural communities?+4
The bill protects domestic agriculture from foreign entities of concern, which could improve rural economies.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+3
The bill is good for rural residents by protecting agricultural land from foreign entities of concern.
The opposite
Would immigrants be better off under this?-2
The bill limits foreign persons from participating in Farm Service Agency programs, which could negatively affect immigrants.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Public Awareness: Section 2(d) mandates a nationwide outreach program to educate landlords, owners, operators, and others about reporting requirements, potentially leading to greater transparency and compliance.
-
Protection of U.S. Agriculture: Several provisions (like Sec 2(a), Sec 3) aim to protect U.S. agriculture from foreign espionage, intellectual property theft, and other malign actions. This could help maintain a stable and secure domestic food supply.
-
Increased Scrutiny of Foreign Investments: Section 5 expands the authority of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to review real estate purchases by foreign entities of concern. This could prevent potentially harmful acquisitions of U.S. agricultural land.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Increased Due Diligence Burden: Section 2(e) imposes due diligence requirements on entities involved in agricultural land transactions. This could increase costs and complexities for buyers, sellers, real estate agents, and title companies.
-
Restrictions on Farm Service Agency Programs: Section 7(b) prohibits foreign persons from participating in Farm Service Agency programs. This could negatively impact foreign individuals or entities currently benefiting from these programs.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Farmers+4Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Business Owners+2Good For Immigrants-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+3Improves Government Transparency+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+4
- Education And Technology
- Improves Intellectual Property Fairness+3
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/8/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/28/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
- 3/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/6/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, Foreign Affairs, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Cliff BentzRepublican · Oregon
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Robert BresnahanRepublican · Pennsylvania
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
Robert OnderRepublican · Missouri
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia