Bill · H.R. 1300· House(119-HR-1300)
PSA Screening for HIM Act
- Introduced
- 2/13/2025
- Last activity
- 2/13/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Neal Dunn
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 31
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "PSA Screening for HIM Act," seeks to amend the Public Health Service Act. It would require group health plans and health insurance issuers to provide coverage for prostate cancer screenings without cost-sharing requirements. This mandate specifically applies to men aged 40 and over who are at high risk, including African-American men and those with a family history of the disease. The bill defines high-risk through family history involving first-degree relatives with specific cancer diagnoses or genetic alterations. These changes are intended to apply to plan years starting on or after January 1, 2026.
Yes· 3 of 18
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+10
Directly addresses the high risk and mortality rates of prostate cancer in African-American men by removing cost barriers.
Would men be better off under this?+9
Provides free cancer screenings for high-risk men, significantly improving early detection chances.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+8
Removes cost-sharing barriers for screenings, benefiting those who cannot afford out-of-pocket costs.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-2
May increase costs for employers providing group health plans.
Does this lower what people pay for private health insurance?-2
Requiring insurance issuers to cover screenings without cost-sharing may lead to slight premium increases to cover the cost.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-2
Imposes a federal standard that limits state-level variation in insurance coverage mandates.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Elimination of out-of-pocket costs for high-risk men: The bill requires that health plans and insurance issuers provide coverage for prostate cancer screenings without imposing cost-sharing requirements. This is intended to minimize barriers to screening for high-risk men to catch cancer before it reaches a late stage (Section 3(a)(1)).
-
Improved survival rates through early detection: By providing coverage for screenings for men aged 40 and over who are at high risk—including African-American men and those with a family history—the bill aims to catch asymptomatic cancer before it metastasizes, as early-stage survival rates are near 100 percent compared to 37 percent for late-stage diagnoses (Section 2 and Section 3(a)(1)(E)).
-
Targeted support for high-risk groups: The bill specifically addresses the needs of African-American men, who have a disproportionately higher rate of prostate cancer and are more likely to die from the disease, as well as men with a family history of the disease (Section 2 and Section 3(a)(1)(E)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly identified within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For African Americans+10Good For Men+9Good For Low Income Households+8Good For Middle Aged+7Good For Retirees+7Good For Seniors+7Good For Middle Class Households+6Good For Asian Americans+5Good For Hispanic Americans+5Good For Native Americans+5Good For White Americans+5Good For Billionaires+4Good For High Income Households+4Good For High Net Worth Individuals+4Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals+4Good For Business Owners-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+8
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+7Reduces Private Insurance Premiums-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+2Increase States Rights-2
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/2/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/10/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 3/25/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 3/10/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 3/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/27/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/13/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Troy BaldersonRepublican · Ohio
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Gerald ConnollyDemocrat · Virginia
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Mike EzellRepublican · Mississippi
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
John JoyceRepublican · Pennsylvania
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Frank MrvanDemocrat · Indiana
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
David ScottDemocrat · Georgia
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Mikie SherrillDemocrat · New Jersey
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida