Bill · H.R. 1163· House(119-HR-1163)
Prove It Act
- Introduced
- 2/10/2025
- Last activity
- 5/4/2026 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 552.
- Sponsored by
- Brad Finstad
- Cosponsors
- - 30 - 0
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
The Prove It Act aims to increase transparency regarding Federal regulatory decisions that affect small businesses. It amends title 5 of the United States Code to require agencies to consider potential indirect costs imposed on small entities. The bill establishes a process where small entities can petition the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration to review agency certifications. If a petition is warranted, a full review is conducted, which may require the agency to perform formal regulatory flexibility analyses. Additionally, the act mandates the publication of guidance documents and establishes consequences for agencies that fail to conduct required periodic reviews of rules.
Yes
Would business owners be better off under this?+7
The bill empowers small business owners with specific mechanisms to challenge and review federal regulatory certifications.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+7
The bill mandates increased disclosure of guidance documents and provides a clearer pathway for reviewing regulatory impacts.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+6
The bill provides significant new tools for small businesses to challenge federal regulations and increase transparency regarding indirect costs.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-2
The bill places stricter procedural requirements and potential penalties on federal agencies.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency on Indirect Costs: The bill requires agencies to consider foreseeable potential indirect costs that a proposed rule might impose on small entities, including those that conduct business with directly regulated entities (Section 2, amending section 603(b)).
-
Right to Petition for Review: Small entities or organizations representing them can petition the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration to review an agency's certification that a rule won't have a significant economic impact (Section 2, Sec. 605A(a)(1)).
-
Access to a Full Review Process: If a petition shows merit, the Chief Counsel conducts a full review, which includes a meeting with the petitioner and agency representatives to discuss economic implications (Section 2, Sec. 605A(d)(1)).
-
Accountability for Agency Cooperation: If an agency fails to attend required meetings or assist in a full review, the final rule will not apply to small entities (Section 2, Sec. 605A(d)(4)).
-
Public Access to Guidance: For rules likely to have a significant economic impact, agencies must publish all guidance documents and allow for public comments to ensure small entities can provide feedback (Section 3, amending section 609).
-
Automatic Review Triggers: The bill introduces a process where, if an agency fails to conduct a required periodic review of a rule within 10 years, the Chief Counsel notifies the agency that the rule has ceased to be effective (Section 4, amending section 610).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Burden of Petitioning: Small entities wishing to challenge a certification must follow a specific, detailed process, which includes providing contact information, organizational status, specific problems, and proposed solutions (Section 2, Sec. 605A(a)(3)).
-
Limitations on Assistance: During consultations, the Chief Counsel is limited to describing the process and helping clarify the petition, and is strictly prohibited from advising a petitioner on whether to amend or withdraw a petition (Section 2, Sec. 605A(b)(3)).
-
Rule Invalidation/Cessation: Rules may cease to be effective if an agency fails to conduct a required review within a 10-year period (Section 4, amending section 610).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+7
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+6
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+7Increases Federal Power-2
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/4/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-108, Part II.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 552.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Small Business. H. Rept. 119-108, Part I.
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 12.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 11.
- 4/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2025
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Troy BaldersonRepublican · Ohio
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Jeff CrankRepublican · Colorado
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Mike KennedyRepublican · Utah
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio
David ValadaoRepublican · California
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas