Bill · H.R. 10571· House(119-HR-10571)
Surge to Save Newborns Act
- Introduced
- 9/24/2026
- Last activity
- 9/24/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Nicholas Langworthy
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 8
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Surge to Save Newborns Act. It amends the Public Health Service Act to create a special grant program for States. The goal is to help States implement timely newborn screening for conditions on a recommended uniform screening panel. The Secretary of Health is required to submit annual reports to Congress evaluating these grants from fiscal year 2027 through 2031. Finally, the bill appropriates $35,000,000 for each of those fiscal years to fund these State grants.
Yes· 3 of 7
Would children be better off under this?+7
The bill provides dedicated federal funding to help states perform timely newborn screenings for various health conditions.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6
The bill mandates annual reports to Congress detailing state-by-state implementation of newborn screening and evaluations of grant effectiveness.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+6
The bill establishes a grant program to assist states in implementing timely newborn screenings for conditions on the recommended uniform screening panel.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-2
The bill appropriates $35,000,000 annually from fiscal years 2027 through 2031 for state newborn screening grants.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2 adds Section 330D(a) to establish a grant program that helps States implement timely newborn screenings for recommended health conditions, which could benefit newborns and their families by catching health issues early.
-
Section 2 adds Section 330D(c) to require annual reports to Congress regarding State-by-State newborn screening implementation and grant effectiveness, which helps hold officials accountable for tracking progress.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific negative impacts, consequences, or burdens identified for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+6Increase States Rights+4Increases Federal Power+3
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+6Increases Research Funding+4
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+7
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility+3Reduces Government Spending-2
- 10/1/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/24/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Troy BaldersonRepublican · Ohio
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Kim SchrierDemocrat · Washington
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York