Bill · H.J.Res. 126· House(119-HJRES-126)
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities that have not been authorized by Congress.
- Introduced
- 9/19/2025
- Last activity
- 9/19/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Jason Crow
- Cosponsors
- - 55 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution directs the President to stop using United States Armed Forces for hostilities that have not been specifically authorized by Congress. The resolution cites military strikes on vessels occurring on September 2, 2025, and September 15, 2025, as instances of hostilities. It finds that Congress has not declared war or provided statutory authorization for military force against specific terrorist organizations or drug trafficking entities. The document also notes that Congress lacks sufficient information regarding the targets of these recent military strikes. Finally, the resolution seeks to terminate these unauthorized uses of force unless a formal declaration of war or specific statutory authorization is provided.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The bill calls for greater transparency regarding the targets, cargo, and justifications for military strikes.
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+4
The bill shifts emphasis from unilateral military strikes toward diplomatic and law enforcement tools.
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+3
The resolution seeks to end unauthorized hostilities, which likely reduces current military spending on those specific un-authorized actions.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The bill limits the unilateral power of the President to engage in hostilities without explicit Congressional authorization.
Does this tighten control of the border?-2
By limiting the use of military force against drug trafficking entities, the bill may reduce immediate military interdiction capabilities at the border.
Would union members be better off under this?-1
Reductions in military activity may have indirect, negligible impacts on labor sectors, but none are explicitly stated.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Restoration of Congressional Authority: By directing the President to terminate unauthorized hostilities, the bill asserts the finding that Congress has the sole power to declare war under Article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution (Section 1, Clause 1).
-
Increased Transparency for Decision Makers: The bill highlights that Congress has not received sufficient information regarding vessel passengers, cargo, destinations, or threats (Section 1, Clause 6). Addressing this could provide the public and officials with a better understanding of military actions.
-
Emphasis on Alternative Methods for Security: The resolution notes that Congress intends to provide resources for drug trafficking prevention through intelligence, law enforcement, and technology rather than solely through military strikes (Section 1, Clause 8).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Potential Delay in Addressing Threats: The resolution directs the termination of military force against entities engaged in the promotion, trafficking, and distribution of illegal drugs unless specifically authorized (Section 2, Clause a).
-
Specific Limitations on Defense Justifications: The bill explicitly states that drug trafficking does not constitute an armed attack or a threat of an imminent armed attack, which limits the use of military force for self-defense in those specific circumstances (Section 2, Clause b).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+4Reduces Military Spending+3
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security-2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers-1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5Increases Federal Power-5Increase States Rights-1
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/2/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/19/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/4/2025
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 10/31/2025
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 10/28/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/21/2025
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 10/17/2025
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- 10/10/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 10/3/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 9/19/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Sean CastenDemocrat · Illinois
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Donald NorcrossDemocrat · New Jersey
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Suhas SubramanyamDemocrat · Virginia
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia