DemocratBill · H.J.Res. 126· House(119-HJRES-126)

A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities that have not been authorized by Congress.

Rep. Crow
Age: 47 years
Colorado
Introduced
9/19/2025
Last activity
9/19/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Sponsored by
Jason Crow
Cosponsors
Democrat - 55Republican - 0
International Affairs
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This joint resolution directs the President to stop using United States Armed Forces for hostilities that have not been specifically authorized by Congress. The resolution cites military strikes on vessels occurring on September 2, 2025, and September 15, 2025, as instances of hostilities. It finds that Congress has not declared war or provided statutory authorization for military force against specific terrorist organizations or drug trafficking entities. The document also notes that Congress lacks sufficient information regarding the targets of these recent military strikes. Finally, the resolution seeks to terminate these unauthorized uses of force unless a formal declaration of war or specific statutory authorization is provided.

Yes· 3 of 4

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5

    The bill calls for greater transparency regarding the targets, cargo, and justifications for military strikes.

  • Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+4

    The bill shifts emphasis from unilateral military strikes toward diplomatic and law enforcement tools.

  • Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+3

    The resolution seeks to end unauthorized hostilities, which likely reduces current military spending on those specific un-authorized actions.

The opposite· 3 of 4

  • Does this give the federal government more power?-5

    The bill limits the unilateral power of the President to engage in hostilities without explicit Congressional authorization.

  • Does this tighten control of the border?-2

    By limiting the use of military force against drug trafficking entities, the bill may reduce immediate military interdiction capabilities at the border.

  • Would union members be better off under this?-1

    Reductions in military activity may have indirect, negligible impacts on labor sectors, but none are explicitly stated.