Bill · H.Con.Res. 3· House(119-HCONRES-3)
Expressing support for the Geneva Consensus Declaration on Promoting Women's Health and Strengthening the Family and urging that the United States rejoin this historic declaration.
- Introduced
- 1/13/2025
- Last activity
- 1/13/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Ronny Jackson
- Cosponsors
- - 22 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A concurrent resolution is how the House and the Senate settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for the Geneva Consensus Declaration on Promoting Women's Health and Strengthening the Family. It urges the United States to rejoin this international declaration. The text notes that the U.S. was originally the lead cosponsor under President Donald J. Trump, but was later removed as a signatory by President Joseph R. Biden. The resolution affirms commitments to improve women's health, protect life at all stages, and uphold the family as foundational to society. It also states that there is no international right to abortion and supports working with the executive branch to prevent foreign funding or conducting of abortions, abortion lobbying, or coercive family planning.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+6
The resolution defends the sovereignty of countries to adopt their own national policies regarding women's health and family values.
Would women be better off under this?+5
The resolution affirms a commitment to advancing the health and dignity of women throughout their lives.
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?+5
The resolution affirms commitments to improve health outcomes for women and protect the family.
The opposite
Does this make abortion easier to get?-7
The resolution explicitly seeks to ensure the United States does not fund abortions or abortion lobbying abroad.
Does this send more money or help to other countries?-5
The resolution seeks to prevent the United States from funding abortion and coercive family planning in foreign countries.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Women's Health and Human Rights: Section (1) affirms commitments to improve health for women, noting that the human rights of women are an integral part of all human rights and fundamental freedoms. This is viewed positively as a dedication to advancing women's health outcomes.
-
Protection of Life and Family: Section (1) and Section (2) applaud signatory countries for protecting life at every stage and recognizing the family as the natural and fundamental group unit of society that is entitled to protection. This benefits people by valuing human life at all development stages and supporting family units.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Restriction on Abortion Access and International Obligations: Section (1) affirms that there is no international right to abortion or any obligation to finance or facilitate it, and Section (5) resolves to ensure the United States does not conduct or fund abortions, abortion lobbying, or coercive family planning in foreign countries. This may be considered a negative outcome or burden by individuals who advocate for international abortion access, funding, and reproductive healthcare rights.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Improves Abortion Access-7
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+6
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Women+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+4Increases Foreign Aid-5
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/13/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 17 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Robert AderholtRepublican · Alabama
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Virginia FoxxRepublican · North Carolina
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Richard HudsonRepublican · North Carolina
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Doug LaMalfaRepublican · California
Barry LoudermilkRepublican · Georgia
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
David RouzerRepublican · North Carolina
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Daniel WebsterRepublican · Florida
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas