Second Degree Amendment · S.Amdt. 6828· Senate(119-SAMDT-6828)
To modify the provision relating to the relationship of this Act to existing law.
- Introduced
- 9/23/2026
- Last activity
- 9/28/2026 — Under the order of 9/28/26, amendment SA 6828, notwithstanding the adoption of amendment SA 6776, agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96 - 1. Record Vote Number: 245.
- Sponsored by
- Tammy Baldwin
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 0
- Changes amendment
- 119-SAMDT-6776
- On the bill
- 119-S-4668 — Protect College Sports Act of 2026
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Adopted
What this amendment would do
Ms. Baldwin submitted the amendment numbered SA 6828, which aims to strike section 121 of the bill and replace it with new provisions concerning the relationship between the title and existing law.
Purpose and Changes
-
The amendment stops any State or political subdivision from using laws, regulations, rules, requirements, or standards that conflict with the title in a way that prevents compliance.
-
It blocks States from governing, regulating, or invalidating the policies or rules of an institution, conference, or intercollegiate athletic association that regulate student athlete compensation for name, image, and likeness, student athlete transfers, and eligibility to participate in intercollegiate athletics.
-
It preserves certain State laws and common law rights or remedies from being preempted, displaced, or supplanted, such as Uniform Athlete Agent Acts, civil rights laws, tort law, criminal law, privacy or data breach laws, contract law, trademark law, copyright law, and consumer protection law, provided they do not conflict with subsection (a).
-
It also preserves State laws and common law rights or remedies that give rise to a cause of action for personal injury, wrongful death, property damage, sexual assault, harassment, fraud, abuse or hazing injuries, deficient campus safety measures, failures to provide greater protections than specific health, wellness, and safety standards, and related derivative causes of action, provided they do not conflict with subsection (a)(2).
-
It establishes a rule of construction stating that antitrust laws are not preempted, displaced, or supplanted to the extent that liability for antitrust violations is not limited by the title.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this amendment.
- The Senate: a vote on a proposed change to the billAmendment Agreed to 96–1
A vote on one change, not on the bill. A bill can collect dozens of these, and losing one does not stop it.
09/28/2026 · Roll call 245 · recorded as “On the Amendment S.Amdt. 6828 to S.Amdt. 6776 to S. 4668 (No short title on file)”
- 9/28/2026
- Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Under the order of 9/28/26, amendment SA 6828, notwithstanding the adoption of amendment SA 6776, agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96 - 1. Record Vote Number: 245.
- Senate amendment agreed to: Under the order of 9/28/26, amendment SA 6828, notwithstanding the adoption of amendment SA 6776, agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96 - 1. Record Vote Number: 245.
- Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 6828 proposed by Senator Baldwin to Amendment SA 6776.
- Amendment SA 6828 proposed by Senator Baldwin to Amendment SA 6776. To modify the provision relating to the relationship of this Act to existing law. (consideration: CR S5039)
- Under the order of 9/28/26, amendment SA 6828, notwithstanding the adoption of amendment SA 6776, agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96 - 1. Record Vote Number: 245.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/23/2026
- Senate amendment submitted
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia