Second Degree Amendment · S.Amdt. 2186· Senate(119-SAMDT-2186)
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to reversing cuts to the Social Security Administration, which may include cuts ordered by the Department of Government Efficiency or any other cuts to seniors' services.
Age: 39 years
Georgia
- Introduced
- 4/4/2025
- Last activity
- 4/4/2025 — Amendment SA 2186 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 180.
- Sponsored by
- Jon Ossoff
- Cosponsors
- - 8 - 0
- Changes amendment
- 119-SAMDT-1717
- On the bill
- 119-HCONRES-14 — Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
- Introduced
- Failed
What this amendment would do
This amendment, numbered SA 2186 and proposed by Mr. Ossoff along with several other senators, aims to add a deficit-neutral reserve fund to the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2025.
Purpose of the Change
- The purpose of this fund is to allow the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate to make adjustments and revise allocations for legislation that reverses cuts to the Social Security Administration.
- The targeted cuts specifically include those ordered by the Department of Government Efficiency or any other cuts to seniors' services.
- The rules of this fund require that any legislation passed for this purpose does not increase the deficit over the total period of fiscal years 2025 through 2034.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this amendment.
- The Senate: a vote on a proposed change to the billAmendment Rejected 49–50
A vote on one change, not on the bill. A bill can collect dozens of these, and losing one does not stop it.
04/04/2025 · Roll call 180 · recorded as “On the Amendment S.Amdt. 2186 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)”
- 4/4/2025
- Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 2186 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 180.
- Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 2186 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 180.
- Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 2186 proposed by Senator Ossoff to Amendment SA 1717.
- Amendment SA 2186 proposed by Senator Ossoff to Amendment SA 1717. (consideration: CR S2351-2352) To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to reversing cuts to the Social Security Administration, which may include cuts ordered by the Department of Government Efficiency or any other cuts to seniors' services.
- Amendment SA 2186 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 180.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Senate amendment submitted
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts