The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
▶In committee17 billsIntroduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Sep 21
This bill names a specific United States Postal Service facility after Officer Blake A. Reynolds. The building is located at 501 West Memorial Drive in Muncie, Indiana.
Yes· 2 of 3
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+2Naming a federal facility after an officer provides positive recognition for service members and public safety personnel.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+2The bill honors a fallen officer, providing recognition that positively impacts the military and law enforcement community.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Sep 16
This bill allows certain military retirees with combat-related disabilities to receive both their retired pay and veterans' disability compensation at the same time.
Yes
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+9Military retirees with combat-related disabilities are granted full concurrent receipt of retired pay and veterans' disability compensation, significantly improving their financial support.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+9The bill allows military retirees with combat-related disabilities to concurrently receive both retired pay and veterans' disability compensation without traditional offsets.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · Aug 27
This bill directs the Department of Health and Human Services to perform an annual study.
Yes· 2 of 8
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3The bill mandates public access to healthcare competition datasets through an interactive website.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+2The study's focus on competition and consolidation could improve consumer protection by identifying market monopolies.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · Jul 13
This bill updates rules for Nuclear Regulatory Commission hearings and uranium enrichment facilities.
Yes· 2 of 7
Would business owners be better off under this?+6Energy companies and facility developers benefit from faster licensing and reduced regulatory delays.
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?+4Faster development of nuclear energy facilities supports a transition toward carbon-free energy sources.
The opposite· 2 of 5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?-4The ability to issue licenses without hearings and use informal procedures reduces transparency and public scrutiny.
Does this give communities more say over data centers built near them?-3The bill reduces community input by allowing the Commission to issue certain permits and licenses without a full hearing.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Agriculture · Mar 5
This bill aims to amend the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996.
Yes· 2 of 4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+7The bill mandates the publication of audit reports, board activities, and budgets on the USDA website to increase public oversight.
Would farmers be better off under this?+4The bill increases transparency regarding the administration and finances of commodity boards that affect agricultural producers.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary · Mar 5
This bill seeks to amend title 17 of the United States Code. It aims to provide for the diagnosis, maintenance, and repair of certain digital electronic agricultural equipment.
Yes· 2 of 6
Would farmers be better off under this?+7The bill empowers farmers by allowing them to diagnose, maintain, and repair their own digital electronic agricultural equipment without violating copyright laws.
Would business owners be better off under this?+6The bill reduces potential barriers to maintaining and repairing expensive digital agricultural equipment used in business operations.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · Mar 5
This bill proposes an amendment to the Clean Air Act. It seeks to exempt certain nonroad engines and vehicles from specific emission standards.
Yes· 2 of 3
Would farmers be better off under this?+6Farmers are directly benefited by the exemption of their equipment from Clean Air Act emission standards.
Would business owners be better off under this?+5Business owners in the agricultural sector benefit from the removal of compliance costs related to engine emission standards.
The opposite
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-5The bill weakens environmental protections by exempting agricultural nonroad engines and vehicles from emission standards.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · May 6
This bill proposes several changes to the Social Security Act. It aims to improve risk adjustment under Medicare Advantage by requiring the use of two years of diagnostic data starting in 2026.
Yes· 2 of 9
Does this lower the price of prescription medicines?+8The bill mandates that outpatient drugs be provided at a price not exceeding the purchase price minus discounts or rebates.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+7The bill reduces drug costs and improves Medicare access for seniors.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Apr 24
This bill aims to address incorrect billing by off-campus hospital locations. It seeks to promote site-neutral payments by redefining off-campus outpatient departments and removing certain exceptions.
Yes· 2 of 7
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+5The bill promotes site-neutral payment policies to reduce expenditures for services furnished under Medicare.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+4The bill aims to reduce overbilling for Medicare services used by seniors.
The opposite
Does this make health care easier to get in general?-2The removal of the site-neutral exception for off-campus emergency departments may affect how emergency care is billed and accessed.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Apr 24
Short Summary H.R. 3022, also called the "Restoring Rights of Physicians to Own Hospitals Act", aims to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act.
Yes· 2 of 13
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+7Increased incentive for physicians to build and own hospitals in underserved rural areas.
Would business owners be better off under this?+6Directly benefits medical professionals acting as business owners.
The opposite· 2 of 4
Does this strengthen the Affordable Care Act?-5The bill specifically seeks to repeal a ban established under the Affordable Care Act.
Does this give the federal government more power?-4Reduces federal restrictions on private ownership of healthcare facilities.
