The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
▶In committee6 billsIntroduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Financial Services · Mar 18
This bill aims to stop Federal agencies from taking adverse actions against people just because they provide business assistance to cannabis-related legitimate businesses.
Yes· 2 of 4
Would business owners be better off under this?+7The bill provides legal protections and market access that benefit owners of cannabis-related legitimate businesses and their service providers.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+6By protecting business assistance providers, the bill helps cannabis-related businesses access essential financial, legal, and real estate services.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary · Sep 10
This bill aims to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. The primary purpose is to reauthorize grants intended to support law enforcement officers and families.
Yes
Does this make mental health care easier to get?+5The bill extends grants specifically designed to support officers in crisis, which typically includes mental health services.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+3Reauthorizing these grants maintains access to support services for law enforcement officers.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · Jul 15
This bill directs a specific change for the Department of Energy. It requires the Secretary of Energy to move the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management out of Washington, DC.
Yes
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+3The relocation brings federal jobs and economic activity to the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania area.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Would union members be better off under this?-3The relocation may lead to employee attrition and impact collective bargaining capabilities.
Would people in cities be better off under this?-2The loss of a government office may reduce federal presence and economic activity in Washington, DC.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Foreign Affairs · Jun 26
This bill aims to clarify the Department of State's exclusive authority over the au pair cultural exchange program.
Yes· 2 of 5
Does this give the federal government more power?+5The bill establishes exclusive federal regulatory authority over the au pair program, pre-empting state laws.
Does this make child care cost less?+5The bill directs a proposed rule to modify stipends to ensure the program remains affordable for host families.
The opposite
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-5The bill prohibits states and their political subdivisions from enacting or enforcing laws related to the au pair program.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · Feb 21
This bill proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create a new tax credit. The credit is intended for the domestic production of high-performance rare earth magnets.
Yes· 2 of 9
Would business owners be better off under this?+6The bill provides significant tax credits for business owners involved in domestic magnet production.
Does this cut taxes for small businesses?+5The bill provides a production tax credit for manufacturers of high-performance rare earth magnets.
This bill aims to amend title 38 of the United States Code. The purpose is to expand eligibility for headstones, markers, and burial receptacles administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Yes· 2 of 3
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+5The bill benefits the families and legacies of deceased veterans, which is often of interest to older generations.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+5The bill expands burial benefits such as headstones and markers for certain deceased veterans.
