Bill · S.Res. 878· Senate(119-SRES-878)
A resolution requesting information on the Republic of El Salvador's human rights practices pursuant to section 502B(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.
- Introduced
- 9/23/2026
- Last activity
- 9/23/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4939-4940)
- Sponsored by
- Timothy Kaine
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution requests that the Secretary of State provide a detailed statement on the human rights practices of the Republic of El Salvador. The requested report must be delivered to specific congressional committees no later than 30 days after the resolution is adopted. It focuses heavily on gathering information regarding individuals who are not citizens of El Salvador but were removed there by the United States Government. The text requires data on potential human rights violations, including arbitrary arrests, torture, and due process violations. Additionally, the bill asks for descriptions of United States steps to promote human rights and assess safety conditions prior to removals. Finally, it demands various details regarding agreements, financial transactions, and specific actions taken concerning individuals sent to El Salvador in 2025 and 2026.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The primary objective of the resolution is to mandate a comprehensive report from the State Department on human rights practices and agreements involving El Salvador.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+4
The resolution explicitly requests information on due process violations and opportunities for individuals to challenge wrongful removals.
Would immigrants be better off under this?+4
The resolution seeks to protect non-citizens from human rights violations, wrongful removals, and lack of due process.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 1(b)(1): This provision requires the collection of credible information on alleged human rights violations in El Salvador, such as torture, unlawful imprisonment, and disappearances. This could benefit people by bringing transparency and accountability to the treatment of individuals removed from the United States.
-
Section 1(b)(2)(D): This provision asks for a description of steps taken by the United States to assess how El Salvador treats non-citizens prior to their removal. This includes conducting individualized assessments to determine if individuals might face persecution, torture, or harm, which could protect vulnerable people from dangerous conditions.
-
Section 1(b)(3)(D) and (I): These provisions require descriptions of actions the United States Government is taking to ensure the return of non-citizens in compliance with court orders, and to facilitate the release or return of people wrongfully removed. This could directly benefit individuals by helping wrongfully removed persons get back to safety.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text of the bill does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5Improves Due Process+4Increases Federal Power+2
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+3Improves International Alliances+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Pathway To Citizenship+3Improves Racial Equity+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+4
- 9/23/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4939-4940)