Bill · S.Res. 816· Senate(119-SRES-816)
A resolution honoring 35 years of independence for the countries of Central Asia and recognizing the importance of the United States growing relationship with Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.
- Introduced
- 7/23/2026
- Last activity
- 9/17/2026 — Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4790)
- Sponsored by
- Steve Daines
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 3
- Introduced
- Adopted by the Senate
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution honors the 35th anniversary of independence for the countries of Central Asia, which includes Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. It highlights the end of the Soviet Union's reign in 1991 and the subsequent growth of bilateral relations between the United States and these nations. The text recognizes these countries as critical partners in countering terrorism, illicit trafficking, and regional instability. It also notes their role as a geopolitical bridge for global trade, energy security, and digital connectivity. Finally, the Senate officially congratulates these nations, affirms the strategic importance of the relationship, and supports their right to self-determination and sovereignty.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+2
The resolution affirms the strategic importance of growing relationships with Central Asian nations.
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+2
The resolution promotes deeper educational, cultural, and professional exchanges.
Does this make trade with other countries easier?+2
The resolution identifies Central Asia as a vital geopolitical bridge for global trade and energy security.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Sovereignty: Under resolved clause (3), the Senate fully supports the inherent right of all countries to determine their own foreign policy, security arrangements, and economic alliances without external coercion. This is a positive outcome because it respects the freedom and self-determination of these nations and their people.
-
Peace and Security: Under resolved clause (4), the Senate affirms that the independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of the Central Asian countries are foundational to peace, security, and the balance of power across Eurasia. This could benefit people by promoting stability in the region.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- As an expert legislative analyst looking at the text provided, there are no specific sections, provisions, negative consequences, or burdens identified for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+2Improves International Alliances+2Improves International Trade+2Increases Counter Terrorism Funding+1
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+1Good For Students+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+1
- Education And Technology
- Improves Internet Access+1
- 9/17/2026
- Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4790)
- 8/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4271-4272)
- 2 Cosponsors added.
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada