Bill · S.Res. 68· Senate(119-SRES-68)
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States shall not deploy United States military assets or personnel to Gaza for purposes of "taking over" Gaza.
- Introduced
- 2/10/2025
- Last activity
- 2/10/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S821)
- Sponsored by
- Timothy Kaine
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the sense of the Senate regarding the deployment of military assets to Gaza. It states that the United States should not deploy military personnel or assets for the purpose of "taking over" Gaza. The text cites concerns regarding the displacement of people and the financial costs of such an operation. It also notes a lack of congressional authorization for the use of military force in the region. Ultimately, the resolution seeks to prevent the United States from fulfilling the objective of taking control of Gaza.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+5
The resolution opposes the deployment of military assets and the resulting high costs of military operations.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+5
The resolution states that avoiding control over Gaza would prevent fracturing relations with United States partners.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+5
The resolution seeks to prevent the expenditure of untold billions of taxpayer dollars on military operations in Gaza.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-3
The resolution emphasizes that there is no congressional authorization required by law for such military force.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of United States lives and funds: The resolution seeks to prevent the risk to United States lives and the expenditure of untold billions of taxpayer dollars on military operations in Gaza.
-
Preservation of international relations: The text suggests that avoiding control over Gaza would prevent fracturing relations with United States partners in the region and around the world.
-
Prevention of radicalization: By not asserting control, the resolution aims to avoid validating the Iranian regime's rhetoric and fostering higher levels of radicalization and terrorism.
-
Support for Palestinian rights: The resolution notes the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, an independent state, and to live with dignity.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts for individuals or groups are explicitly listed as consequences of passing this resolution within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+5Reduces Military Spending+5
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Middle Class Households+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power-3
- 3/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S821)
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Jon OssoffDemocrat · Georgia
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont