Bill · S.Res. 636· Senate(119-SRES-636)
A resolution requesting information on the Republic of Guatemala's human rights practices pursuant to section 502B(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.
- Introduced
- 3/10/2026
- Last activity
- 3/10/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S964-965)
- Sponsored by
- Timothy Kaine
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
S. Res. 636 is a resolution that requests the Secretary of State to provide a detailed statement regarding human rights practices in the Republic of Guatemala. The requested information must be submitted to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs within 30 days of the resolution's adoption. This statement needs to include credible information on alleged human rights violations committed by the Guatemalan government. It also requires a description of steps taken by the United States government to promote human rights and assess the treatment of non-citizens removed to Guatemala. Additionally, the resolution asks for information regarding U.S. security assistance, agreements, financial transactions, and specific details on individuals sent to Guatemala in 2025 and 2026.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+4
The resolution mandates comprehensive reporting from the State Department regarding human rights conditions and agreements.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+3
It emphasizes protecting due process rights and reviewing potential violations for non-citizens removed abroad.
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+3
The resolution encourages rigorous reporting and oversight regarding U.S.-Guatemala diplomatic and security arrangements.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 1(b)(1) requests all available credible information concerning alleged human rights violations by the Government of Guatemala, including arbitrary arrest, torture, due process violations, and trafficking. This could be considered positive because it brings transparency and accountability to how people, including non-citizens removed from the United States, are treated.
-
Section 1(b)(2)(D) asks for a description of U.S. steps to assess, prior to removal, how the Government of Guatemala would treat non-citizens, including conducting individualized assessments for potential persecution and ensuring legal status. This might be considered positive as it aims to protect vulnerable individuals from harm or unfair treatment after being removed.
-
Section 1(b)(3)(D) and Section 1(b)(3)(I) require a description of U.S. actions to ensure the return of non-citizens removed to Guatemala in compliance with U.S. court orders and to facilitate the release or return of people wrongfully removed. This could benefit individuals by working to correct wrongful removals and upholding court-ordered protections.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that create negative consequences, burdens, or penalties for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4Improves Due Process+3
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+3Improves International Alliances+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Pathway To Citizenship+3
- 3/10/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S964-965)