Bill · S.J.Res. 97· Senate(119-SJRES-97)
A joint resolution proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
- Introduced
- 11/20/2025
- Last activity
- 11/20/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Jon Husted
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution proposes a balanced budget amendment to the United States Constitution. It requires that total government expenditures and receipts be balanced, though this balance can occur over more than one year. Expenditures will include all federal spending except for debt payments, and receipts will include all incoming funds except those from borrowing. Congress must achieve this balanced budget within ten years after the amendment is ratified by three-fourths of the states within a seven-year period. Additionally, the resolution allows Congress to exceed these spending limits during emergency situations if a two-thirds vote is achieved in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Yes
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?+9
Enforcing a constitutional requirement for a balanced budget heavily promotes long-term federal fiscal discipline.
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?+8
The constitutional amendment mandates that federal expenditures and receipts be balanced over time, which aims to significantly reduce long-term national debt.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+7
Requiring a balanced budget within ten years will likely force Congress to significantly curb federal spending and outlays.
The opposite
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-3
Mandated budget balancing could lead to potential cuts in vital public services and safety net programs heavily relied on by low-income households.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?-2
The strict ten-year deadline to balance the budget could burden the public if the government is forced to cut vital services or raise funds.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2: This section allows Congress to authorize spending that exceeds the balanced budget limits during emergency situations if a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate agree. This is a positive safeguard because it ensures the government can still respond to urgent crises.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 1: This section requires Congress to achieve a balanced budget within ten years of the amendment's ratification, meaning expenditures and receipts must be balanced over time. This could potentially burden the public if the government is forced to cut vital services or raise funds in order to meet the strict ten-year deadline.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility+9Reduces National Debt+8Reduces Government Spending+7
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households-3Good For Middle Class Households-2
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida