Bill · S.J.Res. 78· Senate(119-SJRES-78)
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to the authority of Congress and the States to regulate contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections and to enact public financing systems for political campaigns.
- Introduced
- 9/17/2025
- Last activity
- 9/17/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Adam Schiff
- Cosponsors
- - 11 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
S.J. Res. 78 proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution regarding election money. It would allow Congress and the States to set reasonable, viewpoint-neutral limits on raising and spending money to influence elections. The resolution also allows for the creation of public campaign financing systems to reduce the influence of private wealth. Additionally, it gives the power to distinguish between natural persons and corporations, including the ability to ban corporations from spending money on elections. The amendment explicitly states it cannot be used to limit the freedom of the press.
Yes· 3 of 9
Does this limit or expose the money behind campaigns?+10
The bill is explicitly designed to enable comprehensive campaign finance reform.
Does this make elections run better?+6
Aims to reduce the disproportionate influence of private wealth and corporations in elections.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+5
Reduces the electoral influence of the wealthy relative to low-income citizens.
The opposite· 3 of 10
Would billionaires be better off under this?-10
Directly targets the ability of the wealthiest individuals to influence elections via spending.
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?-8
Specifically designed to restrict the influence of private wealth.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-7
Directly limits the power of high net worth individuals to fund campaigns.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Limits on Election Spending: Section 1 allows for reasonable limitations on raising and spending money, which could regulate how elections are influenced.
-
Public Financing: Section 2 allows for public campaign financing systems designed to restrict the influence of private wealth by providing increased public funding.
-
Regulation of Corporations: Section 3 allows Congress and States to prohibit corporations or other artificial entities from spending money to influence elections.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Government Regulation of Spending: Section 1 gives Congress and the States the power to regulate and impose limitations on the spending of money by candidates and others to influence elections.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+5Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Billionaires-10Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals-8Good For High Net Worth Individuals-7Good For Business Owners-6Good For High Income Households-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Campaign Finance Reform+10Improves Electoral Process+6Reduces Lobbying+4Increase States Rights+3Increases Federal Power+3Improves Government Transparency+2Improves Freedom Of Speech-3
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-2Reduces National Debt-2Improves Fiscal Responsibility-1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Voting Rights+4Improves Freedom Of Speech-3
- 2/3/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts