Bill · S.J.Res. 37· Senate(119-SJRES-37)
A joint resolution terminating the national emergency declared to impose duties on articles imported from Canada.
- Introduced
- 3/11/2025
- Last activity
- 4/3/2025 — Held at the desk.
- Sponsored by
- Timothy Kaine
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 1
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Awaiting House
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to terminate a specific national emergency. The emergency was originally declared by the President on February 1, 2025, via Executive Order 14193. This declaration was used to impose duties on articles imported from Canada. By passing this resolution, the Senate and House of Representatives would end that declared emergency.
Yes· 3 of 16
Does this cut taxes for middle-income families?+2
Eliminating import duties on Canadian goods can lower costs for middle-class consumers.
Does this cut taxes for small businesses?+2
Reducing import duties lowers the cost of goods for small businesses importing from Canada.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+2
Lowering tariffs provides relief to small businesses that rely on Canadian imports.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-1
Terminating an emergency reduces the scope of unilateral presidential trade powers.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The Senate: the vote on whether to pass the joint resolutionJoint Resolution Passed 51–48
A joint resolution is a bill by another name: it goes to the other chamber and then to the President. Most of them are used to overturn a rule an agency has made.
04/02/2025 · Roll call 160 · recorded as “On the Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 37”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Removal of Duties: The termination of the national emergency used to impose duties on articles imported from Canada could benefit those impacted by these extra costs. (S. J. RES. 37)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+2Reduces Middle Class Taxes+2Reduces Small Business Taxes+2Improves Consumer Protection+1Improves Economic Growth+1Increases Job Creation+1Reduces Inflation+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+2Improves International Trade+2Improves Diplomatic Engagement+1
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+2Good For Low Income Households+1
- Healthcare
- Reduces Hospital Costs+1Reduces Prescription Drug Costs+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Interstate Commerce+1Increases Federal Power-1
- 4/3/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 4/2/2025
- Senate Committee on Finance discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Senate Committee on Finance discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2121)
- Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S2121-2137)
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 48. Record Vote Number: 160.
- Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 48. Record Vote Number: 160.
- 4/1/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/11/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Rand PaulRepublican · Kentucky
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia