Bill · S. 685· Senate(119-S-685)
Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act
- Introduced
- 2/24/2025
- Last activity
- 2/24/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Ted Cruz
- Cosponsors
- - 17 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act" aims to facilitate cooperation between State and local law enforcement and Federal officials. It establishes that local officers complying with Department of Homeland Security detainers are considered agents of the Department of Homeland Security. The bill provides legal protections and immunity for these local officers and their jurisdictions when complying with such detainers. It defines "sanctuary jurisdiction" as any entity that restricts sharing immigration status information or complying with federal detainers. Furthermore, the Act makes such jurisdictions ineligible for certain federal funds, including Economic Development Administration grants and Community Development Block Grants. These changes are scheduled to take effect on October 1, 2025.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this give the federal government more power?+6
The bill increases federal authority over local law enforcement and restricts local policy-making through financial penalties.
Does this tighten control of the border?+5
The bill facilitates cooperation between local law enforcement and federal officials to assist in immigration enforcement.
Is this likely to grow the economy?+3
The bill reallocates federal grant funds from sanctuary jurisdictions to non-sanctuary jurisdictions.
The opposite· 3 of 7
Would immigrants be better off under this?-6
The bill expands local law enforcement's role in cooperating with federal immigration authorities.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-5
The loss of Community Development Block Grants may negatively impact low-income communities in sanctuary jurisdictions.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?-5
The bill targets jurisdictions based on immigration enforcement, which may affect communities with large Hispanic populations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Enhanced Law Enforcement Cooperation: The bill allows State and local law enforcement to act as agents of the Department of Homeland Security when complying with detainers, providing them with all available authority of the Department (Section 2(a)).
-
Legal Protection for Local Officers: Local officers who comply with Department of Homeland Security detainers are deemed to be acting within the scope of their employment as federal employees, which protects them in legal proceedings (Section 2(b)).
-
Legal Protection for Local Governments: The act states that no liability shall lie against a State or political subdivision for actions taken in compliance with a federal detainer (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Protection for Crime Victims and Witnesses: Jurisdictions are not deemed "sanctuary jurisdictions" if their policies prevent sharing information specifically regarding individuals who come forward as a victim or a witness to a criminal offense (Section 3(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Federal Funding for Communities: Jurisdictions deemed "sanctuary jurisdictions" become ineligible for Economic Development Administration grants and Community Development Block Grants (Section 4(a) and Section 4(b)).
-
Mandatory Return of Grant Funds: If a State or local government is determined to be a sanctuary jurisdiction while receiving funds under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act, they may be required to immediately return those amounts to the Secretary (Section 4(b)(2)(A)).
-
Redistribution of Funds Away from Certain Areas: Funds returned by sanctuary jurisdictions are reallocated to States and local governments that are not sanctuary jurisdictions (Section 4(b)(2)(A) and Section 4(b)(2)(B)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+2Good For Immigrants-6Good For Hispanic Americans-5Good For Low Income Households-5Good For Urban Residents-5Good For African Americans-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+6
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Roads And Bridges-4
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+3Reduces Government Spending-2
- 3/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/27/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Ron JohnsonRepublican · Wisconsin
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana