Bill · S. 526· Senate(119-S-526)
Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 2/11/2025
- Last activity
- 2/11/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
- Sponsored by
- Chuck Grassley
- Cosponsors
- - 8 - 6
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act of 2025 aims to prevent unfair or deceptive practices and the spread of false information regarding pharmacy benefit management services. It prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from charging different amounts for drug costs or dispensing fees while retaining the difference, and limits arbitrary reductions in pharmacy reimbursements. The bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to provide detailed annual reports to the Federal Trade Commission and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. It also mandates reports to Congress regarding enforcement actions, investigations, and the impact of mergers on competition. Additionally, the Act establishes whistleblower protections for individuals reporting violations. The law empowers the Federal Trade Commission and State attorneys general to enforce these provisions.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+7
The act mandates detailed annual reports from pharmacy benefit managers to the FTC and HHS to increase industry transparency.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+7
The bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from engaging in deceptive pricing practices and requires full disclosure of costs and fees.
Does this lower the price of prescription medicines?+6
The bill targets unfair pricing and lack of transparency in pharmacy benefit management to help lower drug costs.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection against unfair pricing: The bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from charging a health plan a different amount for a drug's cost than what they reimburse the pharmacy while keeping the difference (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Prevention of arbitrary reimbursement changes: It stops pharmacy benefit managers from arbitrarily or deceptively reducing or clawing back reimbursement payments to pharmacies (Section 2(a)(2)).
-
Increased transparency for consumers and payers: The Act requires pharmacy benefit managers to disclose costs, prices, and all fees or discounts to health plans and pharmacies (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Enhanced accountability through reporting: Pharmacy benefit managers must report aggregate amounts regarding price differences, fees, and any drug movements to higher-cost formulary tiers (Section 4(a)).
-
Protection for whistleblowers: Individuals who report suspected violations are protected from being fired, demoted, or harassed (Section 5(a)).
-
Legal recourse for employees: Employees facing retaliation can bring actions for reinstatement, back pay, and damages (Section 5(b)).
-
Empowerment of State officials: State attorneys general are authorized to bring civil actions on behalf of their residents if their interests are threatened by these practices (Section 6(b)(1)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Exceptions to pricing prohibitions: Pharmacy benefit managers are not in violation of certain pricing rules if they pass along 100 percent of price concessions or rebates to the health plan or payer (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Potential for industry mergers: The bill requires the Commission to analyze whether its requirements might lead to mergers among pharmacy benefit managers or pharmacies, which could impact competition (Section 4(b)(1)(E)).
-
Privacy of information: The Commission is prohibited from disclosing information that constitutes a trade secret or confidential information, except when necessary for enforcement (Section 4(b)(3)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+7Improves Due Process+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers+4Good For Low Income Households+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+7
- Healthcare
- Reduces Prescription Drug Costs+6
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+2
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
Joni ErnstRepublican · Iowa
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont