DemocratBill · S. 5040· Senate(119-S-5040)

A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose limitations on high-income taxpayers with large retirement account balances.

Rep. Wyden
Age: 77 years
Oregon
Introduced
7/21/2026
Last activity
7/21/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sponsored by
Ron Wyden
Cosponsors
None
Taxation
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to place limitations on high-income taxpayers who possess large retirement account balances. It establishes a cap on annual contributions to various retirement plans once a specific balance threshold is met. Additionally, the bill increases the minimum required distributions for these individuals. To facilitate this, the legislation allows for certain distribution rights and provides exceptions to the 10 percent additional tax on early distributions. These changes are intended to target specific high-income groups with significant aggregate account balances.

Yes

  • Does this raise taxes on the highest earners?+7

    The bill imposes contribution limits and increased required distributions on high-income taxpayers with large retirement balances.

  • Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?+3

    The bill increases required distributions from large retirement accounts, which may increase federal tax revenue through higher current income.

  • Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?+2

    By targeting extreme wealth concentration in retirement accounts, the bill aligns with broader goals of economic redistribution.

The opposite· 3 of 4

  • Would high-income households be better off under this?-7

    High-income earners face new limits on retirement contributions and higher mandatory distribution requirements.

  • Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-7

    The bill specifically targets individuals with large aggregate retirement balances by restricting further tax-advantaged accumulation.

  • Would people over 65 be better off under this?-4

    The bill mandates higher required distributions which may alter long-term retirement planning and liquidity for high-balance account holders.