Bill · S. 4833· Senate(119-S-4833)
No Robot Bosses Act
- Introduced
- 6/18/2026
- Last activity
- 6/18/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- Sponsored by
- Edward Markey
- Cosponsors
- - 5 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "No Robot Bosses Act" limits how employers use automated decision systems for work-related decisions. It prohibits employers from relying predominantly on these systems and requires clear disclosures to affected workers and applicants. The bill mandates that developers and employers conduct evaluations and annual impact assessments to identify risks and discrimination. It also establishes the Fairness and Transparency Office within the Department of Labor to oversee compliance. Workers are given the right to opt out of automated management in favor of human managers. Finally, it provides whistleblower protections and allows for private lawsuits to hold violators accountable.
Yes· 3 of 28
Would union members be better off under this?+8
Requires collective bargaining over the implementation of automated systems.
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?+8
Imposes strict requirements on developers of automated decision systems regarding testing and transparency.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+7
Provides a private right of action and mandates clear appeal processes for automated decisions.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would business owners be better off under this?-6
Increases operational costs through mandatory audits and potential statutory damages.
Would billionaires be better off under this?-4
Increases regulation on the AI software companies they often own or invest in.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?-4
Imposes significant reporting, evaluation, and disclosure burdens on employers with 11 or more employees.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Human Oversight and Control: Workers can opt out of being managed by an automated system and instead be managed by a human manager (Section 3(b)). Applicants can also opt out of having their materials processed by automated systems (Section 3(c)).
-
Increased Transparency: Employers must disclose when an automated decision system is used, what data is collected, and how the system measures characteristics (Section 3(a)(2)).
-
Prevention of Discrimination: The bill requires predeployment evaluations and annual impact assessments to identify and mitigate risks of disparate impact based on protected characteristics (Section 4(a) and 4(b)).
-
Legal Protections and Recourse: Covered individuals have a private right of action to sue for damages, including statutory damages, if the act is violated (Section 9(a)(3)).
-
Whistleblower Safeguards: Employers are prohibited from retaliating against individuals who complain about violations or refuse to follow an automated system's output when exercising professional judgment (Section 8).
-
Right to Collective Bargaining: Employers must provide advance notice and bargain in good faith with collective bargaining units before implementing automated decision systems (Section 12(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Employer Burdens: Employers must conduct detailed predeployment evaluations and annual impact assessments, which requires significant reporting and documentation (Section 4(a) and 4(b)).
-
Developer Obligations: Developers are required to conduct detailed reviews and produce reports on the functioning and risks of their systems before they can be offered or licensed (Section 4(a)(1)).
-
Administrative Requirements: Employers must provide specific disclosures and updated notices at least 7 days before taking adverse work actions or changing practices (Section 3(a)(2)(B)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers+8Good For African Americans+6Good For Asian Americans+6Good For Hispanic Americans+6Good For Native Americans+6Good For People With Disabilities+6Good For Immigrants+5Good For L G B T Q Community+5Good For Low Income Households+5Good For Women+5Good For Men+4Good For Middle Aged+4Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Seniors+4Good For Students+4Good For Veterans+4Good For White Americans+4Good For Young Adults+4Good For Business Owners-6Good For Billionaires-4
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+7Improves Privacy Rights+6Increases Federal Power+6
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+6Improves Disability Rights+5Improves Gender Equality+4Improves L G B T Q Rights+3
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+8Improves Data Privacy+7
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Union Protections+7Improves Small Business Support-4Reduces Government Spending-2
- 6/18/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts