Bill · S. 2316· Senate(119-S-2316)
Cooper Davis and Devin Norring Act
- Introduced
- 7/17/2025
- Last activity
- 7/17/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Roger Marshall
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Cooper Davis and Devin Norring Act aims to amend the Controlled Substances Act to combat the illegal sale and manufacture of certain drugs. It requires electronic communication service providers and remote computing services to report specific controlled substances violations to the Attorney General. These violations include the illegal distribution of fentanyl, methamphetamine, counterfeit substances, or unauthorized prescription medications. When a provider obtains knowledge of these crimes, they must submit a report within 60 days. The bill includes specific requirements for what information must be in these reports and how the Attorney General handles them.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?+6
The bill targets the illegal distribution of fentanyl and other controlled substances to combat drug proliferation.
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?+5
The bill imposes new reporting obligations on electronic communication service providers.
Does this give the federal government more power?+4
The bill expands the authority of the Attorney General to receive and act upon data from private service providers.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-4
The bill requires service providers to report user information to the Attorney General, facilitating increased government insight into user activities.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?-4
The mandate to report user identifying information and communications to the government impacts personal privacy.
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
Service providers face significant financial penalties and civil liabilities for non-compliance.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Reduction of illegal drug proliferation: The duty to report is intended to reduce the unlawful sale, distribution, or manufacture of counterfeit substances and certain controlled substances like fentanyl and methamphetamine (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Data privacy protections for providers: The law does not require a provider to monitor users, monitor the content of communications, or affirmatively search or scan for these specific crimes (Section 2(g)).
-
Preservation of encryption: The bill does not prohibit a provider from using end-to-end encryption or require them to decrypt communications (Section 2(g)(5)).
-
Accountability through public reporting: The Attorney General is required to publish an annual report detailing the number of reports received and the outcomes of investigations (Section 2(j)).
-
Data minimization: The Attorney General must take reasonable measures to limit the storage of reports to only what is necessary for investigations (Section 2(e)(3)(A)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial penalties for service providers: Providers that knowingly fail to submit required reports can be fined up to $190,000 for an initial violation and up to $380,000 for subsequent violations (Section 2(f)(1)).
-
Civil liability for providers: Providers may face civil penalties between $50,000 and $100,000 if they submit reports containing materially false information or omit required identifying information (Section 2(f)(2)).
-
Information disclosure to law enforcement: While law enforcement cannot submit reports, they can disclose information from received reports to government attorneys, employees, and other government personnel (Section 2(h)(2)).
-
Data preservation requirements: A report submitted by a provider acts as a request to preserve the reported contents and any related digital files for 90 days (Section 2(i)(1)(A)(i)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Improves Opioid Crisis Response+6
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Domestic Surveillance-4
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners-3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+3
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+5Improves Data Privacy-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+4Improves Government Transparency+2Improves Privacy Rights-4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Freedom Of Speech-2
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/17/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana