Bill · S. 2198· Senate(119-S-2198)
Military in Law Enforcement Accountability Act
- Introduced
- 6/26/2025
- Last activity
- 6/26/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
- Sponsored by
- Tammy Duckworth
- Cosponsors
- - 5 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Military in Law Enforcement Accountability Act," aims to limit the authority of the Department of Defense and Federal law enforcement to support civilian law enforcement activities. It restricts the Secretary of Defense from providing such support except under specific circumstances like humanitarian crises, natural disasters, or attacks on critical infrastructure. In these cases, the President must submit a written justification to Congress. Additionally, any support lasting longer than 14 days requires a joint resolution of approval from Congress. The Act also prohibits individuals from serving in both the Department of Defense and civilian law enforcement simultaneously, with limited exceptions for reserve members. Finally, it establishes a private right of action for those aggrieved by violations of the Act.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6
The bill requires written justifications to Congress and creates a mechanism for public legal challenges.
Does this change how police departments operate?+5
The bill limits military involvement in civilian law enforcement and provides legal recourse for violations.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+4
By limiting federal/military interference in domestic law enforcement, it empowers local and state authorities.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-4
The bill restricts existing federal executive authority regarding military deployment for domestic purposes.
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-3
The bill acts as a check against potential domestic overreach by military-backed law enforcement.
Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster?-2
The bill adds procedural hurdles and time limits that may slow down rapid military response during disasters.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Congressional Oversight: The Secretary of Defense can only provide support for specific crises—such as humanitarian crises, natural disasters, public health emergencies, attacks on critical infrastructure, nuclear or military attacks, or domestic terrorist incidents—if the President first submits a written justification to Congress (Section 2, subsection a).
-
Time Limits on Military Support: Support provided by the Department of Defense is limited to a maximum of 14 days unless Congress passes a joint resolution of approval for a longer period (Section 2, subsection b, paragraph 1).
-
Prevention of Conflict of Interest: The bill prohibits individuals from serving in any capacity in both the Department of Defense and civilian law enforcement outside of the Department of Defense, which helps prevent simultaneous service (Section 3, subsection a).
-
Legal Recourse for Violations: Any person, State, or local government that is aggrieved by a violation of this Act by the Federal Government or its employees may bring a civil action in court to seek injunctive relief or damages (Section 5, subsection a and b).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Bureaucratic Hurdles During Emergencies: To receive support for events like a natural disaster or a public health emergency, the President must first submit a written justification to Congress explaining how the situation is overwhelming civilian law enforcement capabilities (Section 2, subsection a).
-
Delayed Response Due to Legislative Requirements: If the Department of Defense needs to provide support for longer than 14 days, it must wait for a joint resolution of approval to be enacted by Congress (Section 2, subsection b, paragraph 1).
-
Restrictions on Reserve Members: While there is an exception for reserve members serving in civilian law enforcement, those members must formally and officially recuse themselves from their civilian duties if they are called or ordered to active duty (Section 3, subsection b, paragraph 2).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+6Increase States Rights+4Improves Due Process+3Increases Federal Power-4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Policing Reform+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Domestic Surveillance-3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A-2
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/1/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/26/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California