Bill · S. 1884· Senate(119-S-1884)
Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 5/22/2025
- Last activity
- 4/13/2026 — Became Public Law No: 119-82.
- Sponsored by
- John Cornyn
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 11
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To President
- Became Law
What this bill would do
This Act, known as the ``Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025'', seeks to clarify and improve the existing 2016 Act. It aims to ensure that claims to recover Nazi-looted art are resolved on their actual merits rather than being dismissed due to various legal technicalities. The bill specifically targets defenses that rely on the passage of time or other non-merits discretionary factors. By doing so, it intends to permit claims regardless of the nationality or citizenship of the victim. These changes apply to both pending and future civil claims.
Yes
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+7
The bill enhances legal recourse for victims by precluding time-based and discretionary defenses.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Facilitating Art Recovery: The Act intends to permit claims to recover Nazi-looted art to be resolved on the merits by precluding certain legal defenses (Section 2(a)(1)(A)).
-
Overcoming Time-Based Obstacles: The bill prohibits the use of defenses based on the passage of time, such as laches, adverse possession, acquisitive prescription, or usucapion (Section 2(a)(1)(A) and Section 2(a)(5)(f)). This helps those seeking to recover property despite how much time has passed since World War II.
-
Removing Discretionary Dismissals: It prohibits non-merits discretionary bases for dismissal, such as the act of state doctrine, international comity, forum non conveniens, and prudential exhaustion (Section 2(a)(1)(A) and Section 2(a)(5)(f)).
-
Ensuring Broad Eligibility: The Act intends to allow claims for the recovery of artwork or other property lost due to Nazi persecution, regardless of the nationality or citizenship of the alleged victim (Section 2(a)(1)(A)).
-
Bypassing Specific Legal Rules: The Act intends to allow claims notwithstanding the 'domestic takings' rule established in Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp (Section 2(a)(1)(A)).
-
Clarifying Legal Standing: Any civil claim covered by the Act will be deemed an action where rights in violation of international law are in issue, regardless of the victim's nationality or citizenship (Section 2(a)(3)(B)).
-
Simplified Service of Process: For civil actions brought under this Act, process may be served in the judicial district where the case is brought or any other U.S. judicial district where the defendant can be found, resides, has an agent, or transacts business (Section 2(a)(3)(g)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are explicitly detailed in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+7
- Public Law(4/14/2026)
The text as it became law
- Enrolled Bill
The final version, on its way to the President
- 4/13/2026
- Signed by President.
- Became Public Law No: 119-82.
- 4/2/2026
- Presented to President.
- 3/16/2026
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2497)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2497)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 1884.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2497-2500)
- Ms. Lee (FL) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
- 12/11/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 12/10/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8628-8629; text: CR S8629)
- 12/9/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/18/2025
- Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with amendments. Without written report.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 271.
- 11/6/2025
- Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/22/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont