Bill · S. 1670· Senate(119-S-1670)
INDEX Act
- Introduced
- 5/8/2025
- Last activity
- 5/8/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Dan Sullivan
- Cosponsors
- - 9 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "INDEX Act," aims to amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It focuses on requiring investment advisers for passively managed funds to arrange for the pass-through voting of proxies for certain securities. Under this proposal, advisers would need to obtain voting instructions from people holding interests in those funds. The bill establishes specific definitions for "passively managed funds" and "covered securities." It also outlines rules for how information and voting materials should be shared with investors. Finally, the law includes provisions for exceptions regarding routine matters and specific voting scenarios.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+5
The bill enhances consumer protection by allowing individual investors in passive funds to exercise direct voting rights on their securities.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+4
Middle-income households with passive investments gain more agency over their investment's proxy voting.
Would retired people be better off under this?+4
Retirees holding passive funds or through employer-maintained plans gain enhanced voting rights over their assets.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Voter Agency: Investment advisers for passively managed funds would be required to vote proportionate amounts of securities in accordance with the voting instructions of the persons holding those securities or economic interests. This allows individuals to have a direct say in how their investments are voted. (Section 2(b)(1))
-
Improved Information Access: Investment advisers must provide voting persons with essential materials, including proxy statements, annual reports, and forms for returning voting instructions. (Section 2(f)(1)(A))
-
Simplified Voting Process: The bill allows for the electronic delivery of all required materials, including via internet website addresses, making it easier for people to receive and use information. (Section 2(f)(2))
-
Transparency through Recommendations: Investment advisers are permitted to provide voting recommendations to help people make informed decisions, provided they allow third parties to provide a wide range of views. (Section 2(f)(3))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Administrative Burdens and Costs: While the bill states that a passively managed fund may cover expenses related to providing information, it also prohibits anyone from seeking reimbursement from a registrant for obligations imposed under this section. (Section 2(d)(1))
-
Limited Voting Rights on Certain Matters: For matters that are not "routine," an investment adviser may choose not to solicit voting instructions from any person. If they choose this route, they are not considered in violation of any duty for failing to vote those securities. (Section 2(g)(1))
-
Restrictions on Voting for Uninstructed Shares: If an investment adviser does not receive voting instructions for a certain proportion of shares, they are prohibited from voting those shares, except in specific cases involving routine matters or matters requiring a majority of outstanding securities. (Section 2(b)(2) and Section 2(e))
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Retirees+4Good For High Income Households+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+3
- 5/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/8/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina