RepublicanBill · S. 1498· Senate(119-S-1498)

Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical Stock Transactions (HONEST) Act

Rep. Hawley
Age: 47 years
Missouri
Introduced
4/28/2025
Last activity
12/10/2025 — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 294.
Sponsored by
Josh Hawley
Cosponsors
Republican - 1Democrat - 4
Congress
  1. Introduced
  2. On Calendar

What this bill would do

The Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical Stock Transactions (HONEST) Act prohibits the President, Vice President, and Members of Congress, along with their spouses and dependent children, from purchasing or selling covered investments. These covered investments include securities, commodities, futures, and digital assets, though certain exclusions like diversified mutual funds and Treasury bills apply. Covered persons must divest these assets by specific deadlines based on when they were sworn into office. The bill also mandates reporting of certain federal payments and establishes civil penalties for noncompliance. Additionally, it introduces a $500 fine for failing to file reports required under the STOCK Act. The act further requires that financial disclosure reports be made available to the public in a searchable and downloadable electronic format.

Yes· 3 of 9

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+7

    The bill improves government transparency by requiring annual compliance certifications and publishing them on a public website.

  • Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3

    This bill could lead to greater trust in government, which may indirectly benefit low-income households.

  • Would middle-income households be better off under this?+3

    This bill could lead to greater trust in government, which may indirectly benefit middle-class households.

The opposite· 3 of 4

  • Would high-income households be better off under this?-2

    This bill may be viewed as restricting investment options for high-income households that include Members of Congress and their spouses.

  • Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-2

    This bill may be viewed as restricting investment options for high net worth individuals that include Members of Congress and their spouses.

  • Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?-2

    This bill may be viewed as restricting investment options for ultra-high net worth individuals that include Members of Congress and their spouses.