Bill · H.Res. 963· House(119-HRES-963)
Condemning antisemitism in all its forms, including the proliferation and amplification of antisemitic content on artificial intelligence (AI) platforms, urging robust, transparent safeguards for AI, and recognizing stakeholders working to counter this threat.
- Introduced
- 12/18/2025
- Last activity
- 12/18/2025 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Sara Jacobs
- Cosponsors
- - 25 - 5
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution condemns antisemitism in all its forms, specifically highlighting its proliferation through artificial intelligence and social media platforms. It notes that AI systems can generate or amplify antisemitic content, hate, and harassment. The resolution affirms that combating this issue is a national priority. It urges technology companies to implement robust safeguards to prevent their systems from producing or amplifying such content. Additionally, it encourages the development of standards and improved data sharing to study these dynamics. Finally, it calls for collaboration across different levels of government and industry to protect the dignity of Jewish communities.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?+4
The resolution urges technology companies to implement robust safeguards and transparent reporting for AI platforms.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+4
The bill urges AI platforms to provide periodic public reporting using standardized transparency metrics.
Does this put more money into scientific research?+3
The resolution calls for improved data sharing and researcher access to study antisemitic content on AI platforms.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Implementation of safeguards by technology companies: The resolution asserts that companies developing or deploying AI systems have a responsibility to implement safeguards, such as transparency and coordination with experts, to prevent the amplification of antisemitic content, harassment, and calls to violence (Section 2).
-
Development of standards and enforcement tools: There is an encouragement for the creation of standards, frameworks, and enforcement technology to help identify and mitigate risks associated with AI and hate (Section 3).
-
Improved research and data sharing: The resolution calls for better data sharing and researcher access to study how antisemitic content works on AI-enabled platforms, which can support evidence-based policymaking (Section 4).
-
Educational initiatives: It supports efforts to strengthen digital literacy, Holocaust remembrance, and public awareness, specifically among youth, to help people recognize and resist antisemitic narratives (Section 5).
-
Coordinated crisis protocols: The resolution encourages collaboration between governments, academia, and industry to develop interventions and crisis protocols for violent threats (Section 6).
-
Increased platform transparency: It urges AI platforms to provide periodic public reporting using standardized metrics regarding the prevalence and removal of antisemitic content (Section 7).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Risk of overbroad enforcement: The resolution notes that measures taken to address antisemitism must be careful to avoid discriminatory or overbroad enforcement (Section 8).
-
Potential impacts on civil liberties: The text specifies that any measures used to address these issues must remain consistent with the Constitution and protect civil liberties, due process, and privacy (Section 8).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+4Increases Scientific Research Funding+3Improves Data Privacy+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4Improves Privacy Rights+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+3Good For White Americans+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+1
- 4/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/18/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 26 Cosponsors added.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Kim SchrierDemocrat · Washington
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Juan VargasDemocrat · California
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas