Bill · H.Res. 80· House(119-HRES-80)
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.
- Introduced
- 1/31/2025
- Last activity
- 1/31/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
- Sponsored by
- Mike Rogers
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution provides funding for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. It sets a total limit of not more than $25,977,070 to cover staff salaries and other committee expenses. The funds are split evenly with specific caps for different time periods. Section 2 limits the spending to no more than $12,988,535 for the first session and no more than $12,988,535 for the second session. Section 3 and Section 4 dictate how these payments are authorized, approved, and regulated.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+1
The funding supports the committee responsible for military and veteran affairs oversight.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+1
Providing funding for committee operations ensures the continued functioning of legislative oversight.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+1
Funding the Committee on Armed Services supports the oversight of military and veteran-related matters.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-1
The bill authorizes up to $25,977,070 in government spending for committee operations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 1: This provision sets a clear funding limit for the Committee on Armed Services, which helps keep us informed on how much money is being allocated for committee operations and staff salaries.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain explicit details regarding potential negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+1Reduces Government Spending-1
- 1/31/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington