RepublicanBill · H.Res. 725· House(119-HRES-725)

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1908) to prohibit stock trading and ownership by Members of Congress and their spouses and dependent children, and for other purposes.

Rep. Luna
Age: 37 years
Florida
Introduced
9/16/2025
Last activity
12/2/2025 — Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mrs. Luna. Petition No: 119-11. (<a href="https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/2025120211">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)
Sponsored by
Anna Paulina Luna
Cosponsors
None
Congress
  1. Introduced

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This legislation, titled the "Restore Trust in Congress Act," aims to prohibit Members of Congress, their spouses, and their dependent children from owning or trading "covered investments." These investments include securities, commodities, and futures, though certain items like diversified funds and government bonds are excluded. The bill requires covered individuals to divest their holdings within specific timeframes, such as 180 days after enactment. It also establishes a system for certificates of divestiture and provides exceptions for occupational trades and specific trust arrangements. Violations of these rules will result in financial penalties and the disgorgement of profits.

Yes· 3 of 4

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5

    The bill requires ethics offices to publish fines, reasons for fines, and assessment results on a public website.

  • Would union members be better off under this?+1

    The bill establishes stricter ethical standards for those in legislative positions.

  • Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?+1

    The bill directs financial penalties and disgorged profits into the Treasury of the United States.

The opposite

  • Would high-income households be better off under this?-3

    The bill mandates the divestment of specific high-value investments like securities and commodities for those in office.