Bill · H.Res. 71· House(119-HRES-71)
Condemning the Government of Mexico for failing to fulfill its water deliveries on an annual basis to the United States under the treaty between the United States and Mexico regarding the utilization of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande.
- Introduced
- 1/28/2025
- Last activity
- 1/28/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Monica De La Cruz
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution condemns the Government of Mexico for failing to fulfill its water deliveries on an annual basis to the United States. The failure relates to the treaty between the United States and Mexico regarding the utilization of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. The text was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 28, 2025. It was submitted by Ms. De La Cruz alongside several other representatives. The measure was subsequently referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. Ultimately, the resolution consists entirely of this condemnation.
Yes
Would farmers be better off under this?+3
The resolution seeks to enforce water deliveries that are critical for agricultural operations in the affected regions.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+2
Ensuring consistent water deliveries provides essential water security for residents in rural border and river regions.
Does this invest in rural communities?+2
Addressing water delivery failures can support the agricultural stability of rural areas reliant on these river systems.
The opposite
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?-3
The resolution formally condemns the Government of Mexico, which may strain diplomatic relations between the two nations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that outline positive outcomes or benefits for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Farmers+3Good For Rural Residents+2
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances-3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+2
- 2/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Jake EllzeyRepublican · Texas
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Morgan LuttrellRepublican · Texas
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas