Bill · H.Res. 704· House(119-HRES-704)
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction Model undermines beneficiary access to health care and should not be implemented.
- Introduced
- 9/11/2025
- Last activity
- 9/11/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Mark Pocan
- Cosponsors
- - 24 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the proposed Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model. The resolution states that the model should not be implemented because it undermines beneficiary access to health care. The proposed model would increase the number of services requiring prior authorization in traditional Medicare by 30 percent. It also proposes using private companies and technologies like artificial intelligence to process these authorizations. The House expresses disapproval of this model and requests that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services terminate it.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+7
The resolution protects traditional Medicare beneficiaries from increased administrative barriers to medical care.
Would retired people be better off under this?+7
The resolution opposes changes to traditional Medicare that would hinder access to healthcare for retirees.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+7
The resolution opposes a model that would create more obstacles to timely and necessary medical care through expanded prior authorizations.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Termination of the WISeR Model: By requesting that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services terminate the model, the resolution seeks to prevent the expansion of prior authorization processes that are described as an obstacle to needed medical care. (Resolution Section 3)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Increased Prior Authorization: The model proposes to increase the number of services in traditional Medicare that require prior authorization by 30 percent, which the text suggests undermines beneficiary access to timely and necessary medical care. (Whereas clauses and Resolution Section 2)
- Use of Private Companies: The model proposes contracting with private companies that currently administer prior authorization for private insurance; these companies have a demonstrated record of incorrect decisions on prior authorization requests. (Whereas clauses)
- Use of Artificial Intelligence: The model proposes using technologies including artificial intelligence and machine learning to process authorizations; however, tools using artificial intelligence to review coverage decisions developed by similar private companies have been reported to have 90 percent error rates. (Whereas clauses)
- Physician Burnout: The text notes that prior authorization contributes to physician burnout, which 89 percent of physicians report according to the American Medical Association. (Whereas clauses)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+7Good For Seniors+7
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+7Increases Medicare Funding+5
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/21/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/6/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 9/11/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Kim SchrierDemocrat · Washington
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey