Bill · H.Res. 369· House(119-HRES-369)
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary of Health and Human Services should withdraw a reduction in public notice and comment opportunities.
- Introduced
- 5/1/2025
- Last activity
- 5/1/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Lizzie Fletcher
- Cosponsors
- - 23 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 369 is a resolution expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary of Health and Human Services should withdraw a specific notice. This notice, published on March 3, 2025, would reduce opportunities for public notice and comment. The resolution asks the Secretary to affirm the rulemaking practices that were in effect on February 27, 2025. It emphasizes that public participation is necessary for fair and sound policy.
Yes· 3 of 9
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+8
The resolution explicitly seeks to restore public notice and comment periods, increasing transparency in the regulatory process.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+5
Upholding Administrative Procedure Act standards ensures a more fair and predictable rulemaking process.
Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?+3
Restoring the right to comment on agency rulemaking supports the freedom of expression and public participation.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Maintains public input: By asking to withdraw the reduction in notice and comment opportunities, the resolution seeks to ensure program beneficiaries, State and local governments, human services providers, and organizations can still provide input on proposed regulatory changes.
-
Protects against poor rulemaking: The text states that open rulemaking helps prevent the possibility of arbitrary, harmful, and ill-advised rulemaking.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for people are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+8Improves Due Process+5Improves Freedom Of Speech+3Increase States Rights+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+2Good For Low Income Households+2Good For People With Disabilities+2Good For Middle Class Households+1
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+2
- 6/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/1/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 19 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Cleo FieldsDemocrat · Louisiana
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Lucy McBathDemocrat · Georgia
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida